Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF WHITTINGTON"
Results 141 - 160
of 233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2020, 11:15 am
The matter might be different if the restrictions were imposed on small and disliked groups. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:38 am
Written by Jack Whittington [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
Written by Jack Whittington [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:37 am
Whether that backing takes the form of an official "recommendation" may not matter much. [read post]
4 May 2021, 12:53 pm
As a threshold matter, we sought to determine whether the blog post at issue was protected by our policy on academic freedom. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:03 pm
Please avoid extended background sections reciting familiar Supreme Court precedents or other well-known matters. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
That sells Written by Jack Whittington [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
Whether or not there is an “originalist” theory of construction is a matter of some debate. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:27 pm
However, even if Trump loses, I agree with co-blogger Keith Whittington that a former President could be impeached. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:58 am
These are complicated matters and at least some of these scholars have been changing their views a little recently. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:50 am
This, of course, may be thoroughly consistent with Graber’s views on these matters. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 1:47 pm
Another VC co-blogger, Keith Whittington, did not sign the letter, but has written an excellent article on Lawfare reaching the same conclusion. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:21 pm
Does it matter if we assume that Trump's speech would be protected? [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 10:04 am
What follows should be read in the context of Richard Primus’s and Keith Whittington’s absolutely superb postings on the issues raised by the proposal to pack the federal judiciary with Trump nominees chosen, de facto, by a combination of the Federalist Society (Leonard Leo) and the Heritage Foundation. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
This may be true both in terms of subject matter, but also in terms of volume. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:50 pm
It is in this more muscular form, as a positive safeguard of judicial independence, that the inherent power doctrine has been extended to budgetary matters. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 3:10 am
The chancellor of UIC has now dug in his heels on the matter. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
XX v Whittington Hospital NHS Trust was heard on Monday 16 December. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 11:51 am
(Note that I've consulting for FIRE on various matters, but not on this case, and no-one asked me to blog about it.) [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 7:18 am
Keith Whittington has previously explained on Lawfare all the absurdities entailed by this position. [read post]
