Search for: "INDIANA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION (ALL MEMBERS)"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2007, 5:15 am
The Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications and the Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission are two constitutionally-established commissions comprised of the same seven members. [read post]
Ind. Courts - More on recommendation for Marion County Superior Court Judge Grant W. Hawkins removal
21 Nov 2008, 9:39 pm
" Today the Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications, by counsel, and with the Chief Justice and Commission member John Trimble not participating:files its Response to the Masters' Report and its Recommendation. 1. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:37 am
SJR 1 of 2006: Renames the judicial nominating commission as the commission on judicial nominations and qualifications. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 12:25 am
Michael Young had introduced Senate Joint Resolution (SJR) 1 in 2005 to amend the Indiana Constitution to, among other things, require the Governor to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court or the Court from nominees recommended by a commission on judicial nominations and qualifications, subject to confirmation by the Indiana Senate. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 1:29 pm
Letters sent to individual Commission members will be distributed to all other members. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 7:43 pm
"All of the members of the Commission were impressed by the quality of the lawyers applying for the position," Sullivan said. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:00 am
Given that the commissions are five member panels, and only Judicial District 7 is a 5-county district, this has the effect of prohibiting any district nominating commission from having more than two members from the same county. [read post]
29 May 2009, 11:12 am
The county had a judge resign from the bench shortly after the Indiana Judicial Qualifications Commission initiated an investigation of his business interests and judicial obligations. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 5:55 pm
The Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications, an arm of the state Supreme Court, filed formal disciplinary proceedings against Scheibenberger this summer claiming he committed judicial misconduct. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:18 am
Alters judicial qualifications commission membership and procedures. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:44 pm
Later, he will most likely face some type of disciplinary action from the Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications and the Indiana Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:11 pm
"More from the story:McKinney, in a petition filed with the Indiana Supreme Court on Friday, indicated the process of handling forfeiture funds through the DTF had been approved by an Indiana Attorney General's opinion and a written response from the Indiana Judicial Qualifications Commission. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 11:55 am
The Indiana Election Commission will hear the challenge Friday, Feb. 18—one of 26 candidate challenges on its agenda that day—and the loser can appeal to the state court system.) [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
A public criminal trial ensures the proceedings are fair because it allows members of the public to observe proceedings. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
The Indiana Election Commission denied the petition orally about a week later and the challenger did not appeal. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Alcee Hastings violated the chamber’s rules by having a personal relationship with a member of his staff or accepting inappropriate gifts. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
In his petition, McCarthy maintains that the clause does not foreclose all judicial review and that other constitutional provisions, such as the quorum clause, indicate that physical attendance is a constitutional requirement. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
It is in that sense that judicial semiosis is strategic. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Josh Hawley, and Shana Broussard, who currently serves as counsel to FEC member Steven Walther. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm
” Some of Trump administration’s nominees to the federal judiciary have proven to be controversial, most of Trump’s judicial nominees have, as Jeffrey Toobin noted in a recent New Yorker article, “excellent formal qualifications. [read post]
