Search for: "INDIANA APPELLATE COURT" Results 41 - 60 of 2,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2013, 10:11 am
The appellate court in this case held that such a nexus analysis was also appropriate for the forfeiture provision which applies to stolen or converted property. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:36 am by Wilson Kehoe & Winingham
In this case it is fortunate that the Indiana Supreme Court reaffirmed that Indiana does indeed recognize a rebuttable presumption for minors of this age and reversed the appellate court's ruling. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:57 pm
This news is not so much new, but still worth noting The Indiana Lawyer report on Appellate court rules on GAL fees: "A guardian ad litem must differentiate between attorney and non-legal work when billing in a paternity case, and trial courts must carefully consider guidelines set out in probate-focused Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 1.5 when deciding how to compensate for fees and expenses.The Indiana Court of Appeals ruled… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:53 pm by Barsumian Armiger
The trial court, while indicating it tended to agree with Arrendale’s position, granted Marion Open MRI’s motion reasoning that Indiana’s appellate courts should resolve the issue. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 7:06 am
Certainly the Indiana appellate courts do not recognize any kind of use for legislative history. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 12:46 pm by Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP
Last month, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a written opinion in a case raising an important issue that frequently comes up in Indiana personal injury cases. [read post]
Recently, an appellate court issued an opinion in a case dealing with an evidentiary issue that is applicable to many Indiana personal injury lawsuits. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:02 am by Burton A. Padove
The appellate court ultimately reversed the trial court’s summary judgment order and remanded the case. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 2:59 am
The other half of Indiana's prenuptial agreement law consists of appellate court opinions interpreting IC 31-11-3.If Indiana courts have not interpreted one of the UPAA's statutes, you will need to take a look at the other states interpreting the UPAA. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 8:02 am
This from The Indiana Lawyer of February 9.SCOTUS asked to take Indiana wine caseThe Supreme Court of the United States is being asked to consider the constitutionality of Indiana's wine shipping law, which requires in-person contact before any direct delivery is allowed.While there's no guarantee the nation's highest court will accept it, chances may be greater since conflicting rationale has surfaced among the lower appellate… [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 11:13 am by Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP
Earlier this month, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in an Indiana car accident case discussing whether a man who was killed by an uninsured driver was covered under his employer’s car insurance policy. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:07 pm by Burton A. Padove
Continue reading The post Federal Appellate Court Addresses Expert Testimony Requirement in Recent Product Liability Lawsuit appeared first on Indiana Injury And Family Lawyer Blog. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 3:02 am
The Indiana Court of Appeals has ruled that although Plainfield, Indiana's ban on sex offenders in the parks does have punitive effects, it is not unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:13 am by Burton A. Padove
Ahls, the appellate court ruled wife should receive $115,000 more than she was granted in the original divorce settlement. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Ct., Sept. 22, 2022), an Indiana state trial court judge yesterday issued a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of Indiana's recently enacted restrictive abortion ban. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 8:12 pm
By Mike LimrickOn Friday, April 17, the Indiana Supreme Court issued two opinions.In Bannister v. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 9:41 am by Family Law
From The Indiana Lawyer: A man who previously won his argument that the money garnished for his child support should not be included in determining his Medicaid liability was reversed Wednesday, when an appellate panel determined the Indiana Family and... [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:55 am by Burton A. Padove
However, the Indiana Supreme Court has now vacated the appellate court ruling, reinstating the ruling of the trial court and affirming the 1974 appellate court ruling in Tindall v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:39 am
That the Indiana Supreme Court took on a child support case is interesting in and of itself. [read post]