Search for: "INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS"
Results 21 - 40
of 509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:57 am
Class Action Alleging Antitrust Violations on Behalf of Indirect Purchasers Failed to Satisfy Class Action Requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) because no Methodology for Establishing Class Wide Damages but Request for Class Action Certification under Rule 23(b)(2) taken under Submission California Federal Court Holds Plaintiff filed a putative class action against Apple alleging violations of federal and state antitrust laws;… [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:53 pm
Thus, the Indirect Purchaser class has obtained 80% on the basis of Home City’s sales as the Direct Purchaser class. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 11:45 am
So even though federal law bars these claims, class-action defendants still face them when a separate group of indirect-purchaser class plaintiffs sue in federal court under a hodgepodge of state antitrust laws. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:47 am
On January 31, 2011, the District Court for Southern District of Ohio granted defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion, dismissing indirect purchaser class actions that challenged proposed reverse payment agreements as anticompetitive under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:56 pm
They also cast asparagus on "novel" expert opinions concerning whether the class of plaintiffs suffered actual harm as a result of a conspiracy to restrain trade. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
Jan.27, 2009), in which the Court denied the plaintiff's request, made at the class certification hearing, to withdraw the pending class certification motion in order to substantively redefine the class and conduct additional discovery. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 9:48 am
Obtaining consumers’ phone numbers in such an indirect way is strictly prohibited by the TCPA. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 5:26 am
The courthouse door in North Carolina is now wide open to antitrust plaintiffs making indirect purchaser claims, after the Court of Appeals' decision this week in Teague v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:57 pm
Class Action Alleging Antitrust Violations on Behalf of Indirect Purchasers Failed to Satisfy Class Action Requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) because no Methodology for Establishing Class Wide Damages but Request for Class Action Certification under Rule 23(b)(2) taken under Submission California Federal Court Holds Plaintiff filed a putative class action against Apple alleging violations of federal and state antitrust laws; specifically, the… [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
The problem with this method was that Plaintiffs, as indirect purchasers, were not bringing a federal anti-trust claim. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:22 am
The motion was filed by indirect purchaser plaintiffs in this lithium ion batteries antitrust litigation. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:52 pm
In coming to her decision, Madam Justice Gropper reviewed the authorities in BC for approving settlements in class actions. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:22 am
The California Court of Appeal for the First District held that the indirect purchaser class of plaintiffs failed to show that the trial court improperly denied class certification when it decided that substantial individual questions needed to be resolved to establish injury to class members. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:25 pm
FINRA, the party arguing for a class action waiver has suffered an indirect, yet critical, defeat. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The natural result of those differences is that there can be no certification of a nationwide class of state indirect purchaser plaintiffs because there is no common question of law or material fact. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:36 pm
Anyway, indirect and direct purchaser plaintiffs and defendants produced expert reports for class certification. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
As such, plaintiffs were indirect purchasers to whom the direct purchaser banks passed on all or a part of the allegedly fixed fees, and their claims were barred by the Illinois Brick indirect purchaser rule. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:41 am
Plaintiffs suing Fannie Mae in D.C. federal court for alleged securities fraud took an indirect hit yesterday, as the Kentucky Bar Association's Board of Governors voted to recommend disbarment of the class' lead counsel, Stanley Chesley. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:49 am
Defense attorneys moved to dismiss the class action, id., at 6; primarily Qualcomm argued that plaintiff lacked status to pursue the antitrust claims in the class action complaint, see, e.g., id., at 7-8. [read post]
