Search for: "INDUSTRIAL DOOR V US" Results 1 - 20 of 1,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2008, 8:19 am
Maco Door and Window Hardware (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners House of Lords “Expenditure on a warehouse which was used for storage of goods which the taxpayer was in the business of importing and selling was not expenditure on an industrial building so as to qualify under section 18 of the Capital Allowances Act 1990. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:38 am
Maco Door and Window Hardware (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2008] UKHL 54; [2008] WLR (D) 281 “The expenditure on a warehouse building which was used for storage of goods which the taxpayer was in the business of importing and selling was not expenditure on an industrial building and therefore did not qualify as a capital allowance under s 18 of the Capital Allowances Act 1990. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 9:37 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Direct selling companies and businesses using door-to-door salespersons can minimize IC misclassification risk by enhancing compliance with IC laws. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:55 am
Defendants argue that the pictures are simply pictures of generic types and styles of cabinet doors used throughout the industry. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:19 pm
With the malpractice liability insurance industry, the automobile liability insurance industry and the homeowner's liability insurance industry all having a "dog in this hunt", Medlen v. [read post]