Search for: "INGERSOLL v. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2018, 7:45 am
In 2017, the Washington Supreme Court ruled unanimously for the same-sex couple in Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:57 pm
One such case was in a California Supreme Court case known as Ingersoll v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:01 am
Selected articles concerning employment related issues noted by law firmsSource: The Lexology newsfeed[New users can register free of charge at www.lexology.com/account/register.aspx]Click on the Heading of the item to access the full text of the article.New York - 2010 New York State legislative updateJackson Lewis LLPDuring the 2010 Legislative Term, the New York State Legislature enacted and Governor David A. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:48 pm by Jon Ibanez
” The California Supreme Court in the 1987 case of Ingersoll v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:46 am
The great State of California was the first to interpret these new “rights” in Ingersoll v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:24 am
In California, the California Supreme Court set out criteria to determine if the DUI checkpoint was conducted in a constitutional fashion, (see Ingersoll v. [read post]