Search for: "INGERSOLL v. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 12:21 pm
Ct. 1640 (2010) (Apr. 21, 2010), the United States Supreme Court held that a plan adminstrator’s discretionary authority to interpret a plan is entitled to deference, even if a prior determination with regard to the same claim was invalid.Estate planning with retirement assetsArnstein & LehrFor many individuals, retirement benefits represent a significant portion of their wealth.Second Circuit finds that class arbitration waiver clause is unconscionable, refuses to compel… [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Ingersoll-Rand Co., 14 P.3d 990, 995 (Alaska 2000) (§17); see also Munhoven v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Super. 2010)Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PCIn recognition of their 2009 decision in Ranalli v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:03 am by admin
  Ingersoll in Fort Greene, Brooklyn   Like many New York City public housing properties, Ingersoll is large:   Raymond V. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:02 am
The Court granted the media request seeking same-day access to the audio of arguments in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Salem State College 2nd Cir.o A Win for Working MothersChadwick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 8:44 am
-Dental Bldg., 113 AD2d 276 [1985]; JMJ Contract Mgt. v Ingersoll-Rand Co., 100 AD2d 291, 293 [1984]). [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]