Search for: "INGERSOLL-RAND LIMITED"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2021, 9:29 am
” Ingersoll-Rand Co. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 9:00 am
Ingersoll-Rand Plc, No. 2:19-cv-03291. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:05 pm
Plaintiffs were suing an Irish company called Ingersoll-Rand, an industrial manufacturing company, alleging their father’s exposure to the deadly fibers occurred when he worked as a civilian marine machinist for the U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:05 pm
Plaintiffs were suing an Irish company called Ingersoll-Rand, an industrial manufacturing company, alleging their father’s exposure to the deadly fibers occurred when he worked as a civilian marine machinist for the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Ingersoll-Rand Co., 834 S.W.2d 192, 194 (Mo. 1992); Butz v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:36 am
Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
19 May 2013, 6:28 am
These trendsetters include American Electric Power, Clorox, Dow Chemical, Eaton, Ingersoll Rand, Pfizer and Southwest Airlines. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
Ingersoll-Rand Hussman, ARB No. 11-075, ALJ No. 2011-CER-1 (ARB Sept. 13, 2012), the ARB affirmed a dismissal of a blacklising claim because it missed the 30-day time limit. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:46 am
Greenfields Petroleum follows in the heels of bigger companies like Ingersoll-Rand, Transocean and Stanley Works (now known as Stanley Black and Decker). [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:36 pm
The Appeals Court said, "We affirm the judgment of the district court with respect to the holdback claims for environmental liabilities and the Ingersoll-Rand industrial equipment. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 6:03 am
Ingersoll-Rand Co. (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 1078, 1087.) [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Ingersoll-Rand Co., 14 P.3d 990, 995 (Alaska 2000) (§17); see also Munhoven v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:16 am
Editor’s Note: John Olson is a founding partner of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher’s Washington, D.C. office and a visiting professor at the Georgetown Law Center. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:02 am
(Editor's Note: This post is based on a Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP memorandum by Amy Goodman and Gillian McPhee.) [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:50 am
., Ingersoll-Rand Company and Leslie Controls, Inc., argued that liability should be limited to those in the chain of distribution of the products that contained asbestos. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:50 am
., Ingersoll-Rand Company and Leslie Controls, Inc., argued that liability should be limited to those in the chain of distribution of the products that contained asbestos. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:50 am
., Ingersoll-Rand Company and Leslie Controls, Inc., argued that liability should be limited to those in the chain of distribution of the products that contained asbestos. [read post]
1 May 2009, 9:33 am
" Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:14 pm
., Ingersoll rand Company, Limited, The South Financial Group, and Alaska Air Group, Inc. [read post]
