Search for: "INTERNATIONAL CUSTOM PRODUCTS V US" Results 1 - 20 of 2,199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2017, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh
The United States Supreme Court came out with a new patent law decision in Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:49 am by Dennis Crouch
The court writes: It is understandable that Cisco may have an interest in saving its customers from infringement contentions premised, even in part, on their use of Cisco products. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 8:58 am by Dennis Crouch
US, a case involving Customs & Border Protection (CBP) and antidumping / countervailing duty orders. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:31 am by Docket Navigator
Consequently, Plaintiff’s only available source for relevant information on how the accused products were used . . . is the customer herself. . . . [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:22 pm by Submitted Post
Lowden, International Trade attorney Author, Import Transactions and Customs Compliance In the United States, shipping terms used in domestic commerce are usually governed and defined by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) as enacted in each of the individual states. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 1:17 pm
“The United States and its major trading partners . . . developed a single modern product nomenclature for international use as a standard system of classifying goods for customs,” and therefore base their tariff classification schedules on the Harmonized System. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am by Eric Goldman
The court says the rival makes a trademark use in commerce by using the trademarks in its “metatags” (ugh). [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:03 am by Dennis Crouch
Abitron was formerly the international distributor for Hetronic radio-remote-control products used largely for heavy machinery. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
  Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993).Customs cites many difficulties with the application of the First Sale Rule as the reasons for the proposed change. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:55 pm
  Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993). [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:18 am by Matthew Hickey
A visit to Google Scholar allowed me to quickly identify Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]