Search for: "IP Holdings LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 923
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm by Thomas James
VIP Products LLC For more information about this case, read my blog post about it here. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:40 am by Eric Goldman
* For over a decade, I’ve implored people to stop using the term “Soft IP. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:04 am by Kenan Farrell
A telephonic status conference is scheduled on December 18, 2023. 1.4G Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
Yita, No. 23-494 This case arises from inter partes review proceedings initiated by Yita LLC  challenging the MacNeil IP LLC’s U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:11 am by Gene Takagi
This holds true even if they were contributed to the JV (unless the for-profit provided fair market value in exchange for these assets, which was not the case here). [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Hoagland, Indiana – A legal filing initiated by Davaus, LLC against S7 IP Holdings, LLC and Shawn Gengerke is a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:15 am by Kelly Hughes
At the PTAB, Hyundai filed two new IPRs against Mel Navip LLC [associated with Ni, Wang & Massand, PLLC] patents; Fortinet Inc. filed two IPRs against one Lionra Technologies [associated with Magnetar Capital] patent; and Apple filed two IPRs against DoDots Licensing Solutions [Strategic Intellectual Solutions] patents. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:15 am by Kelly Hughes
At the PTAB, Hyundai filed two new IPRs against Mel Navip LLC [associated with Ni, Wang & Massand, PLLC] patents; Fortinet Inc. filed two IPRs against one Lionra Technologies [associated with Magnetar Capital] patent; and Apple filed two IPRs against DoDots Licensing Solutions [Strategic Intellectual Solutions] patents. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:24 am by Dennis Crouch
MacNeil IP LLC, 69 F.4th 1356, 1366–67 (Fed. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Monsanto Co., 467 U.S. 986, 1003 (1984) (holding that, at least for the purposes of the Takings Clause, individuals have property rights in intangible property, such as trade secrets); Integrated Direct Mktg., LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:26 am by Joanna Herzik
I want to Inquire if your firm specializes in IP cases. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:48 pm by Dennis Crouch
The court compared USC IP’s claims to those invalidated in Electric Power Group, LLC v. [read post]