Search for: "IRISH et al v. STATE OF MAINE et al"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Johann Baptist Homann et al. 1715. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Scheucher, Rechtsanwalt,– the Irish Human Rights Commission, by P. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
Peruta v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified… [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
The Irish Times had a piece. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
This past week we’ve seen the difficulties associated with using private companies and making these companies accountable come into sharp relief in the United States with the latest installation in the case of Mohammed et al v Jeppesen Dataplan. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
The emphasis is therefore on its being a distraction, something that gives pleasure (see ‘Sports Law' by Gardiner et al (Cavendish, 1998). [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:50 am
By the end of 2021, Irish entities had imported €142.5 billion (US $150.3 billion) in IP services from the U.S. [read post]
