Search for: "Iancu v. Brunetti" Results 141 - 160 of 167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for Monday’s decision in Iancu v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
And even if viewed as a regulation of purely commercial speech – and therefore not subject to strict scrutiny – the restriction would at least have to pass muster under the Supreme Court’s test in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
., Ltd. lost a trade mark infringement case regarding its ‘Double C’ logo in China.Katfriend Thomas Key reports on the recent decision of the US Supreme Court in Iancu v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that in Iancu v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Rather, the justices said that the anti-disparagement provision impermissibly targeted ideas based on the offensiveness of their content, in violation of the First Amendment.This week, in Iancu v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Brunetti, involving prohibitions on “immoral or scandalous” trademarks, and Matal v. [read post]