Search for: "Ibarra v. Manheim Investment, Inc." Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Manheim Investments, Inc., 775 F.3d 1193 (9th Cir. 2015), the defendant’s showing was inadequate to meet its burden of showing that the amount in controversy exceeded the amount required under § 1332(d). [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
In so ruling, the appeals court cited its decision in Ibarra v Manheim Investments, Inc., filed simultaneously with this opinion, which held that when a defendant relies on a chain of reasoning that includes assumptions to satisfy its burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million, the chain of reasoning and its underlying assumptions must be reasonable (LaCross v. [read post]