Search for: "Identification Devices v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2015, 7:28 am
For that reason, well-known cases like United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 9:00 am
There are no mandatory data retention laws in the United States of America. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 9:26 pm
The Supreme Court recently observed this challenge to patent claim interpretation, stating in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
-EU Mutual Legal Assistance Agreement, specifically: mutual legal assistance to administrative authorities; expedited transmission of requests; use limitations; identification of bank information; joint investigative teams; and video conferencing. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
Before marketing a device, each submitter must receive an order, in the form of a letter, from FDA which finds the device to be substantially equivalent (SE) and states that the device can be marketed in the U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
(Orin Kerr) This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:55 am
(Orin Kerr) I was at the Supreme Court this morning for the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 8:51 pm
“[R]estraints imposed on government to pry into the lives of the citizen go to the essence of a democratic state” (R. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
The application for the FISC order was personally approved by John Ashcroft, then the Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am
Netflix streams Rick and Morty and Star Trek: Discovery in the United Kingdom but not in the United States because its licensing contract requires such geographical differentiation to confirm with underlying copyright law.[11] For similar reasons, Amazon requires publishers of e-books to specify the countries where they own publishing rights, and it allows sales only to those countries.[12] Google likewise removes certain pages from its search results when ordered to do so… [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:02 pm
The New York Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, recently issued an opinion in the case captioned, People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:47 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:47 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
” The bill would exempt “registered call centers in the United States, or foreign call centers who contract with a company registered in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:15 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:55 am
" United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
