Search for: "Ill. Lumber & Material v. United States"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2021, 6:21 am
United States, 308 F.3d 1283, 1288 (Fed. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:21 am
United States, 308 F.3d 1283, 1288 (Fed. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:21 am
United States, 308 F.3d 1283, 1288 (Fed. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm
At the time the Convention was crafted, it could not have been envisaged that Article 3 (and Article 8, in its train) would ultimately entail an obligation on signatory states to protect individuals from actions taken by, or within the territory of, non signatory states – the so called “extra-territorial effect” created by various rulings of the Strasbourg Court, most notably Chahal v United Kingdom. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
To unite the country. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Exemplified by then-student (and now Federal Trade Commission Chair) Lina Khan’s 2017 Yale Law Journal article “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox,” the details of an entire worldview that blamed lax antitrust enforcement for a variety of economic ills emerged. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
The Elk Grove, Ill., company will pay a $20,750 penalty and perform an environmental project costing at least $221,000. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
The Elk Grove, Ill., company will pay a $20,750 penalty and perform an environmental project costing at least $221,000. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
