Search for: "Illinois v. Wardlow" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
In Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:09 am by Peggy Cross-Goldenberg
” Their article, The End of Intuition-Based High-Crime Areas, which you can access here, presents the first empirical analysis of the Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:55 am by David Markus
S. 1, 4–5 (1989), and how you behaved, Illinois v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 7:16 am
First, the officer testified that the stop occurred in a high-crime area, which is relevant under Illinois v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am by SHG
The law, on the other hand, sees flight as a significant factor: In a 2000 case from Chicago, Illinois v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 4:11 am by SHG
Wardlow, where Chief Justice Rehnquist offered this bit of sophistry: Such a holding is entirely consistent with our decision in Florida v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am by Brian Shiffrin
In Illinois v Wardlow (528 US 119 [2000]), the United States Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, held that a person in a high crime area fleeing at the sight of police is, by itself, sufficient to create reasonable suspicion, under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]