Search for: "Illinois v. Wardlow"
Results 41 - 48
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2014, 6:37 am
Supreme Court ruled in Illinois v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:03 am
The Illinois Supreme Court’s opinion in People v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
More recently, in Illinois v Wardlow (2000), the Supreme Court found that an individual's presence next to a building in a high crime area, holding an opaque bag, together with his unprovoked flight on seeing the police, who were converging on the area as part of a drug crime investigation, did, in fact, furnish a reasonable suspicion that drug crime was afoot and therefore provided justification to chase him. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
More recently, in Illinois v Wardlow (2000), the Supreme Court found that an individual's presence next to a building in a high crime area, holding an opaque bag, together with his unprovoked flight on seeing the police, who were converging on the area as part of a drug crime investigation, did, in fact, furnish a reasonable suspicion that drug crime was afoot and therefore provided justification to chase him. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
in Illinois v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 1:06 pm
” Illinois v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
The law, on the other hand, sees flight as a significant factor: In a 2000 case from Chicago, Illinois v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 4:11 am
Wardlow, where Chief Justice Rehnquist offered this bit of sophistry: Such a holding is entirely consistent with our decision in Florida v. [read post]
