Search for: "Imo v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2007, 8:45 pm
In Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:34 am
Plaintiff has pleaded that, but for defendants' malpractice in failing to advise her properly, she "would have avoided some actual ascertainable damage" (see IMO Indus. v Anderson Kill & Olick, 267 AD2d 10, 11 [1999]), [*2]including sufficient detail as to the "nature of" the underlying claim (see Reid v Druckman, 309 AD2d 669 [2003]). [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:39 am
They have good intentions, but are going about it wrong, IMO. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 1:57 pm
This is a welcome shift, since thousands of applications have been held captive in the Office in the wake of Supreme Court decisions culminating in Alice v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:29 am
In addition, the petition argues that the Supreme Court has repeatedly stated that the private right of action in the Exchange Act should not extend beyond its boundaries. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:20 am
IMO Indus., Inc., 200 N.J. 372, 385 (2009). [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:12 pm
By Eric Goldman D.C. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:53 am
See Barnes v. [read post]
Consumer Review Website Wins 230 Dismissal in Fourth Circuit--Nemet Chevrolet v. ConsumerAffairs.com
29 Dec 2009, 2:53 pm
This allegation has an obvious (and IMO embarrassing) logic flaw. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:01 pm
StubHub case (a state court motion to dismiss). [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 3:13 pm
View the article here LA - Kennedy v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 10:38 am
I believe finding that neither party prevailed in 3344 litigation is a novel outcome (but a reasonable one IMO). [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 4:31 am
Elecs., Inc., 41 AD3d 386 [2007]; IMO Industries Inc. v Anderson Kill & Olick, 267 AD2d 10 [1999]). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:30 am
[Post by Venkat] CRS Recovery, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:27 am
Having left open the state IP claims, the court (also correctly, IMO) says that a right of publicity claim is an IP claim while any other invasion of privacy claim (i.e., the other three prongs of Prosser's four privacy torts) is not. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:08 am
In Belcher Pharms., LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:08 am
In Belcher Pharms., LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:01 pm
(Agency budget data from the Comptroller's Texas Budget Source.)IMO, however, the justice system can and should be a source of significant savings. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:39 pm
Third, this proposal relates to something I argued in my work-in-progress on United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 3:59 am
Accordingly, there is no documentary evidence here sufficient to require dismissal of the legal malpractice claim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) (see IMO Indus. v Anderson Kill & Olick, 267 AD2d 10 [1st Dept 1999]). [read post]
