Search for: "Imo v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2023, 7:41 am by Eric Goldman
In particular, the Supreme Court will be invited to opine on what constitutes state action online, and this could cross over to (unrelated, IMO) questions about whether social media services are or become state actors. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
This still seems like a dangerous state of affairs, where a studio is required to obtain a release from every single person who appears in footage or risk a copyright claim and worst yet an injunction requiring the entire film to be put on hold. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 5:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court in 2017 granted a writ of certiorari in the case of Leidos, Inc. v Ind. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 8:10 pm by Dennis Crouch
  (That is a shaky decision, IMO since this was an interlocutory appeal.) [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:56 pm by Jim Walker
 If a cruise line ignores a IMO rule, there is no consequence. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 4:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The Court’s opinion in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:25 am by Gritsforbreakfast
For some states, that could require major spending on court-appointed lawyers for thousands of convicts.The federal case mentioned is Martinez v. [read post]