Search for: "Impact 180, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 7:32 am
Turning to proximate cause, although the required standard of proximate cause has been imprecisely and variously stated, the alleged malpractice needs to be at least a substantial factor if not the “but for” factor in a plaintiffs damages (180 E. 88th St. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 9:00 am
Abbott is shareholder at Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:46 am
Although expanding employers’ exposure to retaliation claims at the margins, the practical impact of the Leshinsky decision will likely be minimal given the 180-day limitations period applicable to whistleblower claims under Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 12:36 pm
Apac-Georgia, Inc., 236 Ga. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:46 am
Although expanding employers’ exposure to retaliation claims at the margins, the practical impact of the Leshinsky decision will likely be minimal given the 180-day limitations period applicable to whistleblower claims under Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 2:46 pm
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
DeLorme Publishing Company, Inc., et al., No. 15-1025 (Preclusive impact of ITC consent judgment). [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Lee, No. 15-652 (Patent Term Adjustment – whether the 180 day deadline applies; could bleed into admin law issues) Parkervision, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:20 am
Kanneganti, 565 F.3d 180, 190 (5th Cir. 2009)). [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 11:51 pm
HSI and Customs and Border Protection said late last week they have stepped up efforts to combat commercial fraud that directly impacts the economy and public health. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
DeLorme Publishing Company, Inc., et al., No. 15-1025 (Preclusive impact of ITC consent judgment). [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm
Nike, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:12 am
Wal Mart Stores, Inc., the Third Circuit upheld the district court's decertification of the janitors' claims because, although Wal-Mart had a maintenance manual that specified cleaning procedures, and some Wal-Mart employees directed cleaning crews in their work, the janitors worked at 180 stores in 33 states for 70 cleaning contractors. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
DeLorme Publishing Company, Inc., et al., No. 15-1025 (Preclusive impact of ITC consent judgment). [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm
UFP Technologies Inc. purchased Dielectrics Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 11:12 am
” That holding meant that Sandoz had to wait to introduce its licensed product until 180 days after the FDA’s approval, a delay to which Sandoz objected. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
When Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:40 am
(Patent Docs) US: Science Progress article examines impact of gene patents on research (Patent Docs) US: Gene patenting debate continues: round three – Science Friday public debate on National Public Radio (Patent Docs) Products Circadin (Melatonin) – UK: IPO refuses SPC for Circadin (SPC blog) Dovonex (Calcipoltriol) – UK: EWCA upholds Leo Pharma’s patent: LEO Pharma A/S and LEO Laboratories Limited v. [read post]
