Search for: "In Re: Schlumberger Technology Corp."
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:45 am
., (ii) M-I, L.L.C. d/b/a MI-SWACO, and (iii) Schlumberger Technologies Corporation. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:04 pm
Schlumberger Tech. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
The pressures of globalisation on the Japanese economy and intellectual property (Thomson Reuters Scientific) Kenya BrandKenya: the task of branding Kenya’s exports (IP Kenya) Lithuania Commission refuses PGI protection to Džiugas cheese, refuses PDO and PGI status for Germantas cheese (Class 46) South Africa South Africa’s new Deputy President an IP expert (Afro-IP) Spain Delimiting the border between trade mark and unfair… [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(BLOG@IP::JUR) Survey results – Next PTO Director (Patently-O) International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) submission to Special 301 Review (Intellectual Property Watch) (Ars Technica) Outline for today’s ABA-ALI presentation on IP ADR (The IP ADR Blog) US congressional, USPTO officials see Geneva policymaking up close (Intellectual Property Watch) US General – Decisions 9th Circuit limits the scope of in-term covenants not to compete: Comedy Club v… [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
Union Carbide Corp., 402 F.3d. 608 (6th Cir. 2004); In Re Berg Litigation, 293 F.3d. 127 (9th Cir. 2002). [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46) South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP) Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
It brought together opinion leaders in the law of innovation and technology from all over the world, including judges, litigators, patent attorneys, in-house lawyers and academics, to discuss one of the fundamental problems in patent law: the need to assess the prior art, and most notably inventive step (non-obviousness), without hindsight and knowledge of the invention. [read post]
