Search for: "In INTEREST OF DH v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 5:45 am
"In that case, Kaho`ohanohano v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 11:45 am
Here's an interesting piece by Spencer Amdur on United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:48 am
Judicial Watch now seeks all communications between the DHS and the Obama White House, as well as internal DHS records regarding the investigation and the report (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 5:28 pm
The plaintiffs may continue their challenge to the DHS’ authority to establish both STEM Optional Practical Training (OPT) and standard post-completion OPT, the District Court in Washington Alliance of Technology Workers v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 8:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:39 pm
Department of Homeland Security (No. 11-604) and Judicial Watch v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
” On May 20, 2021, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas sent a memo to U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 8:18 pm
Ariz.) -- on motion for reconsideration, finding that: (1) public interest in disclosing names of DHS employees accused of mistreating unaccompanied children outweighed privacy interests; (2) court "clearly erred" by previously suggesting that DHS names could be disclosed under protective order.Fabricant v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 5:17 pm
In response to the December 1, 2017 federal court ruling in National Venture Capital v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE INTEREST OF LB, BO, KO, Minors, STATE OF WYOMING, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 7:03 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
Public Privacy Interests I. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Recently, in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 5:52 pm
” Judge Hanen’s decision in State of Texas v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 3:38 pm
To remedy a non-compliant Notice to Appear, is either (1) issuing an I-261, or (2) amending the Notice to Appear, permitted by the regulations, and would either comport with the single document requirement emphasized by the United States Supreme Court in Niz-Chavez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:00 pm
In striking down a state system of alien registration, the Court in Hines v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm
Later this morning, the Supreme Court will hear argument in the most significant Religion Clause case of the Term, Fulton v. [read post]
