Search for: "In Interest of AE"
Results 41 - 60
of 284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2009, 11:08 pm
Interesting new decision out of the Asbestos MDL the other day, In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 5:57 am
Libretto then asked if either side had any additional evidence to submit for AE 163. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:49 pm
With the argument on severance completed, the court turns briefly to AE 283, a request by KSM lawyer Maj. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:03 am
AE 13. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
The docket order, Appellate Exhibit (AE) 115, listed four motions on which the commission would hear argument and receive evidence: AE 111, a defense motion to abate the proceedings; AE 112, a defense motion to compel production of outstanding discovery from a 2014 request; AE 113, a defense motion to compel the extension of the current contract for the MRI capability at U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 1:24 pm
Courts have read the privilege narrowly when there is a public policy interest in understanding how the government makes certain decisions and in discovering government malfeasance. [read post]
7 May 2019, 12:35 pm
Cheryl Bormann, defense counsel for Walid bin Attash, noted that they were waiting on a ruling on the defense’s filing in AE 615BB, requesting that Parrella decide whether bin Attash’s defense attorneys would be witnesses in the matter of the alleged conflict of interest. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:38 pm
This summary of AERS statistics from the FDA is presents four different ways: Reports Received and Reports Entered into AERS by Year (1999 - 2008) Number of Domestic (U.S.) and Foreign Reports in AERS (1999 - 2008) Reporting by Healthcare Providers and Consumers by Year (1999 - 2008) Patient Outcomes by Year (1999 - 2008) The third statistical analysis, which provides some breakdown on the type of person who submitted the adverse event (AE) report… [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
The commission will hear argument on the following motions (and related motions requesting relief in the form of witnesses or discovery) during that session, in an order to be decided by the Military Judge at the beginning of the 15 April 2013 session, as the interests of justice require: a. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:03 pm
FURTHER INFORMATION: For questions, please contact Hamline Health Law Institute Director and Law Professor Thaddeus Pope at tpope01[at]hamline.edu. ae [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 1:14 pm
Here ae some tips that may be useful: Get medical help first. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:21 pm
Vance Spath in the al-Nashiri military commission, Cohen indicated that his takeaway was to disclose and be forthcoming regarding potential conflicts of interest. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 7:51 am
AES and Quebec v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 1:11 pm
The next issue for discussion is AE 426, a motion from defense counsel Matthew Schwartz. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:36 am
Even information that is relevant and material to the defense may be withheld in the interest of protecting individuals and information related to the RDI program. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 3:36 am
All U.S. exporters, freight forwarders and foreign principal parties in interest are reminded that the new Foreign Trade Regulations (FTR) (15 CFR Part 30) published on June 2, 2008 are now in effect. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
In the interest of judicial economy, can the commission address that follow-on issue now? [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:38 am
Thursday’s session opens with an update on AE 284, the defense motion seeking Skype calls for Al-Nashiri, from prosecution attorney Col. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 1:45 pm
Today, in response to a petition for declaratory order filed in January 2017 by a coalition of investors and project sponsors, FERC ruled that tax equity investments in public utilities does not trigger section 203 of the Federal Power Act provided the interests acquired by investors are “passive” according to the test set forth in FERC’s AES Creative Resources order. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 1:45 pm
Today, in response to a petition for declaratory order filed in January 2017 by a coalition of investors and project sponsors, FERC ruled that tax equity investments in public utilities does not trigger section 203 of the Federal Power Act provided the interests acquired by investors are “passive” according to the test set forth in FERC’s AES Creative Resources order. [read post]
