Search for: "In Interest of AMC"
Results 1 - 20
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2007, 12:59 pm
The AMC Report is available. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 9:18 pm
Looking forward, it will also be interesting to compare and contrast the AMC recommendations regarding monopolization and vertical conduct (see, e.g., 6-8 above) with any consensus that emerges from the FTC/DOJ Section 2 hearings. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
However, when a released claim is based on a property interest that differs from the interest underlying the claims asserted in the class action, the release fails for lack of an identical factual predicate.Here, the APE claims require additional facts: those of holding APE units and harm to APE unitholder rights. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:24 am
Makes it more interesting, I suppose, but at the end of the day, there is nothing here to get too excited about. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 3:31 am
The interesting part is that with this go-round, it will include votes from the APE holders – and AMC baked in a key provision to make approval more likely. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:02 pm
AMC had a blank check preferred stock provision in its articles of incorporation, which the board of directors used to create AMC Preferred Equity units. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 12:00 pm
People interested in finding out more about the ADA can call the Justice Department's toll-free Information Line at 800-514-0301 or 800-514-0383 (TDD), or access the ADA homepage at: www.ada.gov . [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 2:44 pm
Do you recall the old AMC trademark that stood for American Motors Corporation of AMC Pacer fame? [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:25 pm
AMC orally made that commitment in an Aug. 10 meeting involving representatives of the Association of Late Deafened Adults (ALDA), myself and attorneys from the public-interest firm of Disability Rights Advocates in Berkeley. [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:27 am
Plaintiff claimed that, since AMC was RLJE’s controlling stockholder and RLJE directors were interested parties, Plaintiff had successfully rebutted the business judgment rule and shifted the burden of proof to the Defendant directors to show that the deal was a product of both fair dealing and fair price. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
Just one day after Ars and other outlets published comments by the CEO of AMC Entertainment saying he's interested in allowing some texting in theaters, the movie chain is backing away from the idea. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 3:15 pm
Apparently, I’m not the only person who finds AMC’s show “Mad Men” intriguing. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:09 am
Interested parties have 60 days from the date of the publication of the proposed rule in the Federal Register to comment. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:41 pm
This story interested me because I represented a medical student who was nearly killed inside our AMC theatre in downtown Fort Worth. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:59 am
Of interest to devotees of the AMC show "Breaking Bad": Purchasers of Season 5 of the show on iTunes have filed a putative class action against Apple in federal court in the Northern District of California for attempting to charge... [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:57 am
The grant of a privacy injunction in the case of AMC v News Group Newspapers ([2015] EWHC 2361 (QB)) has unleashed a deluge of largely inaccurate media comment worthy of the “super injunction spring” of 2011. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 12:23 pm
’” This allegedly confused the the public about whether the NRA remains an AMc client and endorses the services provided by AMc. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:23 am
The crux of the harm in that case was the exclusion of movies from being offered in second-tier theaters, a theory similar to the harm that seems to have prompted DOJ’s interest here. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 3:15 am
The meme stock saga took another interesting turn last week, when the arbiters of materiality from Reddit charged Wall Street and drove several of their favorites to staggering new heights. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 11:52 am
Season Two of AMC's Emmy-winning drama "Breaking Bad" raises some interesting questions about the division of partnership profits. [read post]
