Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 121 - 140
of 41,865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2019, 8:26 am
In other words, when a party is allowed to ask leading questions under 611(c)(2), does that convert direct into cross for all purposes? [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 8:00 am
District Court Judge Steven C. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:42 am
Sources: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/carriedinterest.asp https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs4.asp? [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 10:13 am
The Court of Justice has handed down an important and interesting judgment on the right of a member State to restrict the number of students coming from other member States. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 9:40 pm
The Court of Justice in Joined Case C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P Sweden and Turco v Council overruled a judgment of the Court of First Instance refusing to give public access to a document of the Council's Legal service containing legal advice. [read post]
4 May 2009, 2:12 pm
Now here's an interesting judgment on preliminary references that takes a liberal approach to their admissibility. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 11:01 am
§1.1273-1(c)(ii). [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:12 am
There is no way that the dozens of interested parties who have essential viewpoints to contribute could have been heard and been fully and fairly considered in less than a month. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 11:09 am
I just read a very interesting article by Thomas C. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:34 pm
Atkinson, Alan C. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 1:30 am
The NHS Trust asked the court for a declaration that it is C's best interest to not receive intubation, mechanical ventilation, or any resuscitative measures. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:03 am
A business league is an association of persons having some common business interest, the purpose of which is to promote such common interest and not to engage in a regular business of a kind ordinarily carried on for profit. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 12:15 am
Thus, C will hold 40% of the outstanding shares (i.e., 20 out of 50). [read post]
30 May 2023, 6:48 am
The Commission approach creates enormous uncertainty and may inhibit public interest participation in the Bill C-11 process. 19. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:10 pm
Jacco Bomhoff over at the Comparative Law Blog - that we admire and recommend - has written a really interesting and thought provoking post on the Court of Justice's recent judgment in Case C-98/06 Freeport. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 1:55 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down an interesting judgment in Case C-118/07 Commission v Finland on the need to amend existing bilateral agreements with non member countries concluded by a member State before it acceded to the EU. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 5:55 am
« Back to newsSubscribeThe post Andrew C. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 1:55 pm
The article traces the impact of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-212/97 Centros Ltd v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 9:18 am
Whatever your interests, C-SPAN has many hours of law geekery for you. [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:36 am
Regina (Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry) v Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, The NHS Confederation (Employers) Co Ltd, interested party Case C-62/09 Court of Justice of the European Union “European Union law did not prevent national health authorities from introducing financial incentive schemes aimed at replacing the prescription of certain medicines by other and cheaper named medicines in the same therapeutic class, provided certain… [read post]
