Search for: "In Interest of Clr" Results 21 - 40 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2013, 5:38 pm by Dan Harris
So how does someone make the leap from being able to read general interest publications in Chinese to being able to read legal documents in Chinese? [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am by war
One point of interest is that Bausch & Lomb sought to show that BSS had become descriptive in the trade by relying on a range of publications which included expressions such as “balanced salt solution (BSS Alcon)”, with subsequent references being just to BSS. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:26 pm by Michael Helfand
 Mark Movsesian over at the CLR Forum blog (for those of you interested in law & religion, the CLR Forum is a must read) weighed in on the issue, noting that I promised a follow-up post. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm by Barry Eagar
" The interests of strangers and of the public are thus bound up with the whole question, as Hamilton L.J. pointed out in the case of  R. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:56 am
”  The IPKat, however, takes a little more interest in matters of substance than most and so has dutifully gone through the judgment (available here) to bring a little more detail. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
While it was intended to be posthumously published, in 1920 the High Court’s constitutional jurisprudence radically shifted in the Engineers case ((1920) 28 CLR 129). [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm by Stephen Page
Put simply, natural justice involves decision-makers informing people of the case against them or their interests, giving them a right to be heard (the hearing rule); not having a personal interest in the outcome (the rule against bias); and acting only on the basis of logically probative evidence (the no evidence rule). [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Laura Sandwell is a graduate of the University of East Anglia with a particular interest in public law. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:19 am by James McComish
A recent judgment of the New South Wales Court of Appeal contains a number of points of interest, even if the ultimate conclusion is routine and unsurprising: an Australian court refused an application for stay of proceedings on forum non conveniens grounds in a case concerning an Australian-resident plaintiff. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 11:12 pm
Phil Sim drew my attention to an interesting aspect of Digg this week:Today, I watched an incident unfold that was enough to convince me that Digg is a legal minefield waiting to happen. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 2:08 am by war
A second interesting point lies in his Honour’s comments on the Champagne Hiedsieck case. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 12:14 pm
Also of interest are the CLAC and CLAN provisions. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:40 am by D. Daxton White
CCG RetailOutlets CCG Clarion Commercial Holdings CLR MortgageCom CLR Colonial Properties Trust CLP Diversified CLP Commercial Assets, Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
”Justice Yates was not satisfied that the suppression order sought was necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice, other than in respect of 3 exhibits tendered at the hearing of the summary dismissal application, the confidentiality of which was not contested by Upaid:“As the High Court emphasised in Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2010) 240 CLR 651; [2010] HCA 21 at [31], it is insufficient that the making or continuation of such an order might… [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
It is in the interest of the State that there should be an end of lawsuits.) [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm by Stephen Page
In the case, called Riley and Riley, all property settlement issues between the husband and wife were settled save one: how much was the husband's interest in the family company worth? [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:00 am by INFORRM
Quite the contrary: in a Kafkaesque twist, the bans promote the views of smaller parties or interest groups and minor candidates by banning them! [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:26 am
For instance, it has been held in Northside Developments Pty Ltd v Registrar-General, (1990) 170 CLR 146 that the rule “only has scope for operation if it can be established independently that the person purporting to represent the company had actual or ostensible authority to enter into the transaction. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Leon Segan never sought leave of court to withdraw as counsel, as required by CLR 321 and 22 NYCRR 604.1(6). [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
This was because the employer and the employee had different, conflicting interests in the civil proceedings brought by the suspect. [read post]