Search for: "In Interest of DG"
Results 21 - 40
of 400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2023, 5:03 am
For now, suffice it to comment from a few interesting angles on today's story. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:38 am
" "Significant" would actually be an understatement for the incisive measure proposed by DG GROW. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 7:21 am
It is, however, always interesting to hear his perspective on SEP policy, and Dr. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:17 am
If anything, Apple has a long-term plan to keep SEP royalties down, and in the mid term it may be interesting to see what happens if Apple uses its own baseband processors and then negotiates a new patent license with Qualcomm. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:34 am
The "researchers" on whose work DG GROW relied even stated explicitly that there is no hard evidence for either hold-up or hold-out. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:14 am
I've criticized conflicts of interest on the part of a couple of the "researchers" contracted by DG GROW in this context, and I've voiced disagreement (and will voice even more disagreement) with their findings going forward. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 10:48 am
Louanne Mahl, No. 2021-SC-0481-DG; and Louanne Mahl v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:10 pm
In policy debates the challenge is always to understand what's in the public interest despite different stakeholders pursuing their particular interests. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 pm
It took place after one plant expressed interest in exporting to Europe. [read post]
22 May 2023, 8:33 am
Aaron DG, Brown TR, Sinha MS. [read post]
20 May 2023, 6:15 am
That was an interesting admission considering that ACT does claim to represent SMEs, does orchestrate submissions by companies claiming to be SMEs facing SEP issues, and Mr. [read post]
15 May 2023, 7:37 am
Given that all companies prefer to retain a maximum degree of flexibility, it would be an overstatement to say that DG COMP walked through an open door. [read post]
9 May 2023, 8:42 am
Public interest assessment The proposal includes provisions that would expand the scope of resolution by reviewing the public interest assessment. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am
What DG GROW did here is an example of socializing costs and privatizing profits. [read post]
4 May 2023, 1:51 am
I've already mentioned that three of the companies on whose input the EC primarily relied upon are actually conflicted (one because of advocacy of implementers' interests, and the other two because they just want to grow their patent data services business). [read post]
3 May 2023, 10:30 pm
It disregards the proven efficacy of standard-essential technology development, established licensing FRAND practices, economic realities and the interests of innovators. [read post]
2 May 2023, 3:37 am
At least two of them simply have business interests related to patent data. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 12:35 am
It doesn't even have industry experts, unlike DG COMP (I'll discuss that in more detail some other time). [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 1:24 am
DG GROW tried--but in my view failed--to preserve the right to enforce SEPs during a FRAND determination. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 5:20 am
Confirmed keynote speakers include Rachel Mulheron (Queen Mary University London) and Andreas Stein (European Commission, DG Justice and Consumers, head of unit). [read post]
