Search for: "In Interest of DG"
Results 21 - 40
of 356
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2023, 2:23 am
As I said last month, DG GROW's proposal is a hot mess that lawmakers can at best dilute, but not fix. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 1:56 am
Other major SEP holders may now be more interested in joining this pool, given that Huawei and Ericsson (as well as various other patent holders) already give the licensing program a lot of substance. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 8:37 am
Without this super-preference, the DGS would not have an interest to be included in finding a different solution instead of liquidation. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 9:53 pm
Katherine Tai and WTO DG Dr. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 4:22 am
I attribute it to a conscious decision--not an oversight--that DG GROW removed utility models from its definition of the term SEP. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:04 am
At a London conference in June, I heard criticism of the proposal from professors who clearly are sympathetic to implementers' legitimate interests. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:32 am
DG GROW's impact assessment claims that they evaluated different options, but they didn't really do so. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 7:58 am
Another example is that there might be patent holders with partly congruent and partly incongruent interests. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:27 am
" The document advocates moving the needle even further to suit the interests of implementers. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:20 am
ACT consistently supports Apple against--but falsely claims to defend the interests of--app developers. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 6:28 am
And if it weren't for the legislative proposal I just mentioned, I'd actually predict an interesting future for Poland as a SEP enforcement venue with great potential to complement the UPC territory on the Eastern side. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 5:03 am
For now, suffice it to comment from a few interesting angles on today's story. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:38 am
" "Significant" would actually be an understatement for the incisive measure proposed by DG GROW. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 7:21 am
It is, however, always interesting to hear his perspective on SEP policy, and Dr. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:17 am
If anything, Apple has a long-term plan to keep SEP royalties down, and in the mid term it may be interesting to see what happens if Apple uses its own baseband processors and then negotiates a new patent license with Qualcomm. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:34 am
The "researchers" on whose work DG GROW relied even stated explicitly that there is no hard evidence for either hold-up or hold-out. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:14 am
I've criticized conflicts of interest on the part of a couple of the "researchers" contracted by DG GROW in this context, and I've voiced disagreement (and will voice even more disagreement) with their findings going forward. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 10:48 am
Louanne Mahl, No. 2021-SC-0481-DG; and Louanne Mahl v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:10 pm
In policy debates the challenge is always to understand what's in the public interest despite different stakeholders pursuing their particular interests. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 pm
It took place after one plant expressed interest in exporting to Europe. [read post]
