Search for: "In Interest of Earles" Results 1 - 20 of 929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2010, 7:24 pm by Josh Wright
For interested readers, a whole host of Earl’s UCLA Working Papers are available here. [read post]
1 May 2008, 2:24 am
Stebenne writes: What is truly new and most interesting in this volume are the essays that deal with the Warren Court's influence on other (i.e., foreign) legal [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 9:51 am
Earl Cadogan and another v Sportelli and another [2008] UKHL 71; [2008] WLR (D) 378 “In determining the price payable by tenants for leasehold enfranchisement, landlords and freeholders generally were not entitled to ‘hope value’ as an element in the value of their interests. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 10:10 am
I want to highlight Earl Ofari Hutchison's must-read commentary on the Davis case. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:26 am
Earl Cadogan and Another v Sportelli and Another and Other Appeals House of Lords “Landlords and freeholders were generally not entitled to so-called ‘hope value’ as an element in the value of their interest in determining the price payable by the tenants for leasehold enfranchisement. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
The Senate, the media and special interest groups were far more cavalier as well. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:35 am
It will be interesting to see what Gatbsy and Merkley say when they're put on the spot by this. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:37 pm
The Lipsons claim that the steps they take should effectively result in the mortgage interest becoming deductible. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
Moke: My take is that one of the central tenets of Warren’s Progressivism involved the interest of public security, an interest that connects the “early” Warren with the “late” Warren. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 10:11 am by David Friedman
What was important about Earl, to all three of us, was not whether he agreed with us but whether he had intelligent and interesting ideas. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:37 pm by Sandy Levinson
It's an exceptionally interesting book in all sorts of ways, including, of course, putting in a fascinating context the attempts by conservative Republicans on the bench to kill the new medical care bill before it, too, becomes "entrenched" within our constitutional order. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 6:28 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Linda Greenhouse has an interesting argument that there should be less opposition between judicial and political roles. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:05 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Earle Partington’s counsel today filed this opposition to the defendants’ dispositive motions. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 5:18 am
On of the more interesting and far reaching aspects of the opinion deals with expert testimony. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am by David Pocklington
“The Earl Marshal’s warrant is plainly directed at the question of flying a flag from the roof or tower of a church[***]. [read post]