Search for: "In Interest of Jrr" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2009, 10:58 am
OUT-LAW has a very interesting application of the rule that one cannot sue for libel in respect of a publication to which one consents:Christopher Carrie is the author of a self-published book in which he claims to have been sexually abused by the son of writer JRR Tolkien, Father John Tolkien. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 12:01 pm
HarperCollins Publishers Ltd. and the trustees of the JRR Tolkien Estate were co-plaintiffs in the claim, which concerned plaintiffs' participation interest in the "Lord of the Rings" films released between 2001 and 2003. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:26 am
var addthis_pub="bevans1986";A rather interesting case on online defamation has turned up.The basic facts are as follows: Christopher Carrie is the author of a book in which he makes claims that he was sexually abused by a Father John Tolkien (a priest) son of the famous writer JRR Tolkien (author of The Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings).Carrie had been publishing on a blog under a pseudonym promoting his book and website, JRR Tolkien's grandson had posted a… [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:00 pm by David Ma
client (private equity fund) looking for a gc. someone 10+ years out, preferably with some in-house experience. dm… https://t.co/pIXMmjmzD6 2019-05-10 scotus asked to weigh in on whether annotations on statutes are copyrightable. interesting arguments on both sides. https://t.co/qCVUM0djXN 2019-05-14 [Click on title above to read the full post] [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 8:59 pm by Isabelle Jacovella Rémillard
Finally, the interests of survivors need to be fully recognized at every step of the justice process, including the investigation stage. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:20 am by Ezra
I really enjoyed it. - Lord of the Rings by JRR Tolkien. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:51 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  Neither the purpose of copyright law nor the interests protected under rights of publicity are really harmed by such works, and copyright’s purpose is arguably advanced. [read post]
3 May 2011, 5:00 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"Logies outrate Osama on Twitter" http://j.mp/m0PpfL interesting ... [read post]
The alternative is to treat the incident report as if it were written by JRR Tolkien, a fantasy, not something with relevance to “real life. [read post]
7 May 2013, 1:59 pm by Jonathan Bailey
New Line Cinema (nor the estate of JRR Tolkien) are not likely to sue you over posting a Boromir meme on your Facebook wall. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:43 pm by Gordon Firemark
(putting Doctor’s financial interests ahead of patient interests) What’s next? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 1:45 pm by Justin Tenuto
Here are our picks for the most interesting, amusing, and preposterous claims from a decade of Potter case law. [read post]