Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2022, 2:31 pm
We welcome applications from scholars studying law and jurisprudence whose research interests dovetail with the mission of the DeLaney Center. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:31 pm
We welcome applications from scholars studying law and jurisprudence whose research interests dovetail with the mission of the DeLaney Center. [read post]
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagree on the inventiveness of expandable hoses [2020] EWCA Civ 871
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am
Floyd LJ concluded that the suggestion that McDonald would interest a garden hose skilled person should have been approached "with a high degree of scepticism" (para. 105). [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:35 pm
It's difficult, without seeing the judges' ruling, to be completely sure that the information Thomas LJ and Lloyd-Jones J would like to publish relating to the treatment of Binyam Mohamed must be published by a British court: originally disclosure was sought in the interests of Mohamed's defence before an American military commission, but now that prosecution has been halted of course. [read post]
15 May 2010, 12:39 am
Here are two upcoming lectures of possible interest to legal historians at the John W. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 2:44 am
In a highly readable and pungent judgment, Laws LJ has some robust things to say about the vaunting of journalistic interests over public security in the guise of Article 10, and the ‘mission creep' of requirements demanded by the courts for state action to be considered "proportionate". [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
: Debating the Constitutionality of Canada’s New Medical Assistance in Dying Law, (44:1 Queen's LJ 69 (2018).Marta Machado & Rebecca J. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:54 am
Finally, he seems to take a different view from Moore-Bick LJ on the relevance of the principle of severability. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:15 am
Although the court's analysis regarding unlawful means conspiracy is comprehensive and fascinating, the points that are most likely to be of interest to IP lawyers relate to TRP's claim for misuse of confidential information:Arnold LJ, and Lewison LJ and Phillips LJ, respectively cited the widely-known three-step Coco v AN Clark test ((i) necessary quality of confidence; (ii) circumstances importing an obligation of confidence; (iii) damage to the… [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:06 am
” Curious report… it will be interesting to read more detailed reports when they surface. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:17 am
It's the second most cited among all specialized or peer-edited or refereed journals [http://lawlib.wlu.edu/lj/], for what that's worth. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
There were two grounds of appeal, and both of them are really quite interesting generally. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
There were two grounds of appeal, and both of them are really quite interesting generally. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 12:53 am
It was, Wilson LJ held, inappropriate to even consider unproven allegations. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:05 am
Floyd LJ, with whom Lewison LJ agreed, therefore dismissed the appeal. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am
With regard to “sufficient interest” of campaigning groups or individuals, in their written submissions the petitioners made reference to the considerations by the Administrative Court (Macur LJ, Chamberlain J) in R (McCourt) v Parole Board for England and Wales [2020] EWHC 2320 (Admin). [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 2:53 am
The observation that the veil can be lifted if there are no minority interests is contrary to the established principle that a one-man company is as much a company as any other; as Rimer LJ points out, “apparently a heretical departure from the Salomon principle”. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
Both questions were raised, but not answered, by Sedley LJ, sitting in the Upper Tribunal, in his judgment in SSHD v BK. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:12 pm
The Court of Appeal's judgmentArnold LJ gave the leading judgment, with which Davis LJ and Popplewell LJ agreed. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
This, in Laws LJ’s opinion, was “a constitutional solecism. [read post]
