Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
The Court of Appeal upheld that decision in May 2008 ([2008] EWCA Civ 445), the leading judgment being given by Jacob LJ, and in 2009 the EPO Technical Board of Appeal revoked the patent. [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:33 am
PatentsGuestKat Léon Dijkman provided an index of some of the most interesting issues in Arnold LJ's wide-ranging FibroGen v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 1:26 am
Briggs and Sales LJ qualified this conclusion (obiter) in that the time value of money may need to be taken into consideration in assessing outstanding benefit and the employee's fair share in the event that the real value of money over time had changed (e.g. as a result of inflation or interest rates). [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 3:07 am
Having regard to the development of social attitudes, I feel able (with the greatest respect to Hale LJ’s views of 17 years ago) not to follow the dicta in Briody on this point. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
He favoured the judgment and approach taken by Beldam LJ in Yaxley, on the basis that Beldam LJ “… had been Chairman of the Law Commission at the time of its working paper and report on Formalities for Contracts for Sales of Land on which the 1989 Act was based. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:27 am
Toulson LJ said that this was irrelevant. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:36 am
Males LJ was correct to hold that the court did not have jurisdiction to dispense with service. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
” (“The Lawyer as Friend: The Moral Foundations of the Lawyer-Client Relation” (1976) 85 Yale LJ 1060 at 1060). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 3:22 pm
” [23] Stanley Burton LJ and Sir Anthony Clarke MR agreed with Maurice Kay LJ. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 5:21 pm
The responses so far to the survey are interesting. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:52 pm
Sedley LJ and Lord Clarke MR agreed with Rix LJ, but Sedley LJ expressed some dissatisfaction with this case. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 5:13 am
In his dissent Briggs LJ stated to agree with the analysis of Kitchin LJ, except on the issue of costs. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:41 pm
Jackson LJ does not seem to have commented on whether the 25% cap (or rather 20.83%) should be split between the solicitor and barrister (or barristers) where both are instructed. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 10:24 am
This was, said Kitchin LJ, an attempt to reargue the case on the facts. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 9:20 pm
Rix LJ disagreed. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
Floyd LJ has roundly rejected Arnold J's reasoning, stating:58.The difficulty I feel with endorsing this reasoning is as follows. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 10:33 am
As some of you saw on Co-Op the other day, there's an unusual exchange going on in the pages of the Georgetown LJ this month. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
The point arises again in Idenix v Gilead and was the subject of some obiter comments by Kitchin LJ. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:48 am
Lewiston LJ, highlighted that Stack was, as Baroness Hale stated, and unusual case in that the couple had gone to great lengths to keep their finances separate. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:48 am
Lewiston LJ, highlighted that Stack was, as Baroness Hale stated, and unusual case in that the couple had gone to great lengths to keep their finances separate. [read post]
