Search for: "In Interest of Lawrence J."
Results 1 - 20
of 669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2018, 12:45 pm
(FINRA Case #2015043939101) Lawrence John Fawcett Jr. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 1:43 pm
This analysis confirmed that cross-section analysis tends to produce poor measures of the relationship of interest and thus misplaced confidence in the findings of such studies. [read post]
17 May 2018, 12:45 pm
(FINRA Case #2015043939101) Lawrence John Fawcett Jr. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 4:40 am
Nancy J. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:06 am
Thought some of my readers would be interested in this interview with Lawrence Lessig which appeared in the New York Times:Lawrence Lessig Answers Your Questions on Copyright, Corruption, and CongressBy Stephen J. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 4:25 am
CASE: J-2 Waiver of Two-Year Foreign Residency Requirement / Over 21-year-old dependent child NATIONALITY: Costa Rican LOCATION: Lawrence, KS Our client is a citizen of Costa Rica who came to the U.S. on a J-2 Visa in August 2002. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:15 pm
J. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 3:36 pm
In today's mail: I received a copy of the new book "The Battle for the Court: Interest Groups, Judicial Elections, and Public Policy," by Lawrence Baum, David Klein, and Matthew J. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 2:14 pm
Lawrence J. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 2:30 am
'Lawrence' Fails to Open Floodgates to Unfettered Sexual Freedom is the title of an article by Howard J. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am
The earlier post “Sufficient interest” in faculty petitions concerns a petition for a confirmatory faculty for the introduction of an unauthorized ledger stone, and explores some features of “sufficient interest” in faculty petitions, Re St Lawrence Toot Baldon [2023] ECC Oxf 10. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 6:06 am
South Brunswick Police Chief Raymond J. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 7:55 am
David J. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 7:55 am
David J. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 7:55 am
David J. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Lessig: Lawrence Lessig is the Roy L. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
Lawrence, 539 U.S. at 578 (stating the Texas statute in question 'furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the personal and private life of the individual'); see also id. at 594 (Scalia, J., dissenting)(noting that majority applied 'rational basis' test to overturn statute). [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 5:31 am
Lawrence J. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Lawrence, Rev. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:14 pm
Bowers, 478 U.S. at 216 (Stevens, J., dissenting). [read post]
