Search for: "In Interest of Njw"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2019, 7:20 am
On the one hand, it is not necessary that the patentee asserts having an enforceable claim against the DNI claimant, because the DNI claimant’s legal position is already affected in a manner worthy of protection if it is asserted that an existing legal relationship may give rise to a claim against it under certain conditions whose occurrence is still unclear (Federal Supreme Court, NJW 1992, 436). [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 2:51 am
Voßkuhle conceeds that he is more interested in the law, and quite happy that in the main, he can stay away from the facts. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 11:03 am
The German Federal Constitutional Court has previously decided that in cases where an artist quotes another artist, Section 51 No. 2 UrhG not only protects the property interests of the original author (and his legal successors) but also the artistic freedom of the "infringing" artist (see BVerfG-K, NJW 2001, 598 "Grenzen der Zitierfreiheit"). [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 5:08 am
It is interesting to consider the reasons this was so, and why Disney is gingerly taking steps as it enters the sports streaming business.According to The Economist ("ESPN starts a streaming service", April 19th), Disney’s ultimate goal (bad sports pun, this ….) for ESPN+ is to create “a sort of mini [njw-at least for the moment] -Netflix for sports”, namely a commercial streaming service, as opposed to pay-tv packages that offer all the coveted… [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:23 pm
Philine Fabig (and myself) in the Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW 2017, 2502 et seq.). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm
Focus on the best interests of the child Given those findings, the Court concluded that the decision whether to grant recognition to the foreign judgment should be guided primarily by the best interests of the child. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 6:11 am
All statistical data quoted above has been taken from an article by Wendt Nassall, NJW 2008, 3390, who is a member of Germany’s most exclusive bar, admitted to the Bundesgerichtshof and amongst those who had been pushing for this reform. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:16 pm
Brehm, ‘Germany privacy and defamation law: the right to publish in the shadow of human dignity’, [1994] European Intellectual Property Review 336 at 347), a retraction (Widerruf) which can be claimed without proof of fault for statements of facts (Statements of opinion can however be dealt with by an injunction if the defendant has no justified interest in their repetition: BGH NJW 1982, 2246 – clinic directors)) which have been made in public, or a rectification… [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:41 am
Merges argued, in his article entitled “Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations", that the— “Court should have considered whether the Guild tended to enhance economic efficiency,' and whether it did so at a lower cost than a formal property right in dress design" [recalling the attention paid by the Court of Appeal to whether the Guild members had IP rights in their dresses--NJW].He went on—… [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 11:00 pm
These cases beg the more interesting question of how valuable a trade mark with the name of a dead person ultimately is. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 6:11 am
All statistical data quoted above has been taken from an article by Wendt Nassall, NJW 2008, 3390, who is a member of Germany’s most exclusive bar, admitted to the Bundesgerichtshof and amongst those who had been pushing for this reform. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 12:33 pm
There are, as far as I could see, two case notes (in German) by now: Wolfgang Hau, LMK 2009, 293079 Ansgar Staudinger/Paul Czaplinski, NJW 2009, 3375 Many thanks to Dr. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:37 am
D&O experts in the U.S. convey their interest in the [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:40 am
Brand equity--"[T]he interest in the economic value of brands as corporate assets that create wealth for the stakeholders in a corporation. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 12:04 am
In the German Rana Plaza case, the claims of the plaintiffs failed because, under the law of Pakistan, they were barred by the statute of limitations, which was extremely short (just one year) compared with German standards, particularly for a cross-border case (see OLG Hamm NJW 2019, 3527). [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
Defendant-Appellant argues that, in light of the foregoing, its interest in a cessation of enforcement outweighs [read post]
