Search for: "In Interest of RE"
Results 1 - 20
of 93,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2010, 9:58 am
Interesting article in Slate re: the concept of "social license" http://ping.fm/yYYtG [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:58 am
In re an application by the General Dental Council (Savery and others, interested parties):[2011] EWHC 3011 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 332 “The General Dental Council was under no obligation to obtain an order of the court for permission to use and disclose dental records of patients for the purposes of investigating allegations of professional misconduct against a registered dentist even where the patients in question objected to the disclosure or did… [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
It sounds like it will be very interesting. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:29 am
Interesting: proof that small firms can be more productive than larger ones. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 1:51 am
While the topic on Renewable Energy (RE) is understandably greek and unappealing to many, it is of great interest to some, as gauged from the number of queries we’ve received. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 7:41 am
Res. 1150: Designating the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) as a National Security Interest and Asset was introduced on March 9, 2010 by Rep. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:33 pm
An interesting reflection all these years later! [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:25 am
Before doing so, be sure that you’re an “interested party” under GAO’s regulations. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 7:40 am
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari In Re Midland Funding, LLC Interest Rate Litigation: Consumer’s Victory Before Second Circuit Stands appeared first on Schlanger Law Group LLP. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 7:40 am
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari In Re Midland Funding, LLC Interest Rate Litigation: Consumer’s Victory Before Second Circuit Stands appeared first on Schlanger Law Group LLP. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:32 am
In In re Rowe, the Sixth U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:45 am
In Re Estate of Joseph I. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:19 am
Next accounting period, you’re incurring interest on the interest you didn’t pay before. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 8:34 pm
This sure looks interesting on Re-entry initiatives. [read post]
