Search for: "In Interest of RLP" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2018, 7:15 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
OCLC researchers have been exploring this topic for some time, and now the RLP is engaging partner institutions via a series of three Works in Progress webinars and an interest group for further exploration. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 10:27 am by David M. McLain
  The coverage dispute was complicated by the Bituminous allegations that Hartford insured Genex in its alleged role as a manager for RLP, as part of Hartford’s insurance of RLP more generally. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 5:10 am
 Likewise, it would seem unlikely that courts would be interested in lifting a stay during the pendency of an appeal covering all challenged (and presumably litigated) claims. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:59 am by Stefan Passantino
Snipes, 1:10-cv-00497-JMS-RLP (9th Cir. 2015), slip op. 49-50 (link to this blog’s past post on Connecticut ruling added – unfortunately). [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:59 am by Stefan Passantino
Snipes, 1:10-cv-00497-JMS-RLP (9th Cir. 2015), slip op. 49-50 (link to this blog’s past post on Connecticut ruling added – unfortunately). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:03 am
Hawaii Members of Swarm..., Case No. 11-CV-00262-DAE-RLP, (Jan. 30, 2012 Order, denying motion to dismiss as to direct and indirect infringement and civil conspiracy, but dismissing allegation that failure to secure WiFi amounts to actionable negligence). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 2:47 pm by Gene Quinn
On July 24, 2012, the Patents Post Grant blog published an interesting article titled Higher Patent Reexamination Threshold Suffers from SNQ Hangover. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 2:47 pm by Gene Quinn
On July 24, 2012, the Patents Post Grant blog published an interesting article titled Higher Patent Reexamination Threshold Suffers from SNQ Hangover. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:55 pm by Stefan Passantino
Snipes, 1:10-cv-00497-JMS-RLP (9th Cir. 2015), slip op. 49-50 (link to this blog’s past post on Connecticut ruling added – unfortunately). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Yet, this solution would essentially combine issues accepted under the old SNQ standard in EXP together with those reviewed under the heightened reasonable likelihood of prevailing (RLP) or More Likely Than Not (MLTN) post grant standard. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:57 pm
  Of particular interest here is H.R. 3269, The Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009, which passed the House on July 31, 2009, and has now moved to the Senate for further review and possible amendment. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:28 am by Quinten Fisher
  The agency requested a revised proposal within five days, and informed Silver Investments that if no response was received within five days, the agency would assume the protester no longer had any interest in pursuing the procurement. [read post]