Search for: "In Interest of RMB" Results 1 - 20 of 444
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2008, 1:22 pm
Here's an interesting story about the foreign investment approval process in China, and in particular about how the RMB valuation problem is infecting policy in strange ways all across the board. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm by BuckleySandler
The SEC did not immediately make the settlement available, but it announced that without admitting or denying the allegations Option One agreed to (i) disgorge over $14 million, (ii) pay prejudgment interest of nearly $4 million, and (iii) pay a $10 million penalty. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:07 am by Jay Salamon
The RMBS issuer would collect all of the individual loan revenues and pay investors periodic distributions of the principal and interest generated by the underlying loan portfolio. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:49 pm by Rich
Equally interesting is that while US exports have benefitted from the current situation, the EU has not. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
Following the highly unusual RMB/ USD change this week, Wang Tao at UBS has issued a special brief on their move. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:42 pm by Philip R. Stein and Kenneth Duvall
Again, contractual language was often key: most, if not all, contracts required investors/trustees to prove that any breach “materially and adversely affected” the interests of the investor. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 12:39 pm by Editorial Board
  RBS’s settlement consists of three component parts: disgorgement of $80.4 million, prejudgment interest of $25.2 million and a civil penalty of $48.2 million. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:57 am by Editorial Board
On July 24, the SEC announced that it had charged three Morgan Stanley entities with misleading investors with regard to two RMBS securitizations that the firms underwrote, sponsored and issued and that the firm agreed to settle the charges. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:39 pm by Darren S. Teshima
Royal Park had acquired the RMBS certificates from another entity via a portfolio transfer agreement (“PTA“), which transferred the “right, title and interest in and to” the certificates. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 12:51 pm by Katie Lieberg Stowe
On August 5, 2015, RMBS investors filed a putative class action against U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by John Jascob
Riddiough’s damage calculation incorporated an error by calculating interest on income; because Sec. 12(a)(2) expressly provides that interest may be calculated on “consideration paid” but does not so provide regarding “income received,” principles of statutory interpretation compelled the conclusion that interest should not be calculated on income. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 11:59 am by Editorial Board
NCUA seeks unspecified damages, equitable relief, pre- and post-judgment interest, and fees and costs. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 4:20 am
In yet another attempt to put pressure on China to revalue the RMB, Secretary Paulson is out on his stump.. and I am beginning to wonder if perhaps he is off his rocker as I hardly see how rising interest rates in the U.S. [read post]
” The Second Circuit found that the certificates issued by the RMBS trusts were “certificate[s] of interest or participation” because (a) they were certificates (as opposed to notes) and (b) payments to certificateholders were contingent on the cash flows from the underlying mortgages. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:15 pm by Darren S. Teshima
On December 23, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed claims against Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, by four pension funds in a putative class action relating to 530 Countrywide RMBS trusts worth $424 billion. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:05 am by James Fee
District Court for the Southern District of New York denied Bank of New York Mellon’s motion to dismiss RMBS claims regarding fourteen trusts and one indenture trust for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 8:09 am by Jennifer Lee
District Court for the Western District of Texas granted summary judgment in favor of defendants Goldman Sachs & Co. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. on certain aspects of the method and rate that will be used to calculate damages in an RMBS suit brought by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. [read post]