Search for: "In Interest of S---G." Results 1 - 20 of 12,008
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2010, 6:17 am by Jeff Shieh
What’s interesting is that these specific reasons are echoed by nearly all applicants who choose to file via the PCT, from the sole inventor to international, multibillion-dollar corporations. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
(In brief, these alternative theories are off the mark because they ignore Gödel’s interest in logical contradictions and the problem of self-reference.) [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
[Thanks to FoIB Randy G!] [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 8:35 am by John Holtz
This unusual requirement severely limited the pool of potential protégés under the program. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:38 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
The amount included is the value of the decedent’s ownership interest, to the extent the decedent’s ownership interest passed at the decedent’s death to or for the benefit of any person other than the decedent’s estate or surviving spouse. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:06 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
That requirement is under Code §6611(g), which requires that interest will not commence to run until the applicable return is filed “in processible form. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:21 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
The value of the corpus of the trust at Gs death is included in the augmented estate under Section 2-207(a)(1) as either an interest owned by S at Gs death or as an interest that passed to the spouse by reason of Gs death. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 3:21 am by Broc Romanek
Here’s an interesting excerpt: AN ACE IN THE HOLE FOR P&G – OR RATHER, A BIG WILD-CARD IN THE DECK – APPEARS TO BE THE EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP PLAN VOTING, which reportedly […] [read post]
23 May 2014, 8:28 am
Sometimes, there's just interesting announcements. [read post]
20 May 2015, 8:28 pm
In articles of interest available online via SSRN: Law professor Elizabeth G. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 5:24 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
  The court held that the court’s common law power to award damages flows from the application of contract law and that subsections 128(4)(g) and 129(5) provide statutory authority to award compound pre‑and post‑judgment interest according to this common law power. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 12:36 pm by Vandenack Weaver LLC
” Petitioners argued that Section 913(g) narrows this discretionary authority under Section 913(f). [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 2:35 pm by Gregory Weber
Finally, this case serves as a great reminder to all contractors who are interested in, or are involved in the SBA’s mentor-protégé program, that the SBA’s regulations can provide significant experience advantages to joint ventures formed under SBA’s Mentor Protégé Program (such as permitting protégés to be held to different experience standards than other offerors). … [read post]