Search for: "In Interest of Tmr"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2021, 6:12 am
Looking for something interesting to read? [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
No. 2018-0452-TMR (Del. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:58 am
The latest issue of The Trademark Reporter provides several foreign language articles that are probably interesting, but of certain interest is an article in English by John M. [read post]
Timely, or too soon? Competition Bureau releases guidance on “failing firm” claims in merger reviews
14 May 2020, 6:00 am
(AIM), because TMR would have likely exited the market without the merger. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:41 am
This brings in an element of accountability while being a learning opportunity for many interested parties. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 1:20 pm
Louisiana Revised Statute 31:210 addresses rental and royalty payments that are owed to parties holding an interest in the leased property when an issue arises as to title. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 1:20 pm
Louisiana Revised Statute 31:210 addresses rental and royalty payments that are owed to parties holding an interest in the leased property when an issue arises as to title. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:20 am
He explains why he thinks the answer is no.Ted finds a number of TTAB decisions to be of interest, and particularly the Board's refusal to recuse itself in a cancellation proceeding involving registrations for the mark TRUMP, in which registrations the President has an interest. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
No. 2018-0394-TMR (Del. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 5:33 am
TTABlog note: Thanks again to The Trademark Reporter for granting permission to provide a link to this issue, which is Copyright © 2013 the International Trademark Association and reprinted with permission from The Trademark Reporter®, 103 TMR 1 (January-February 2013).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 8:20 am
These papers will be considered for possible publication in The Trademark Reporter (TMR), INTA’s legal journal; publication will be subject to the TMR Committee’s editorial review and approval. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 6:03 am
Ted Davis observes in his Introduction that the Supreme Court has taken an uncharacteristic interest in the Lanham Act of late, with three cases now on its docket: one currently under advisement (Static Control v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 3:41 am
In any event, a number of interesting cases have arisen involving the intersection of trademark law and the freedom of speech protection of the First Amendment, with the "Bad Spaniels" dogfight drawing the most attention as it heads to the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
Section 16601 makes enforceable a reasonable non-competition clause executed by any “person who sells the goodwill of a business, or any owner of a business entity selling or otherwise disposing of all of his or her ownership interest in the business entity . . . . [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:10 pm
Because the TMR’s and transferee’s interests are aligned and the statute clearly gives transferees the right to intervene if the transferee is not satisfied with the representation of the TMR, the procedures do not violate the transferee’s due process rights. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 4:25 am
Gallagher raises many interesting questions. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:27 pm
Interesting question. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 am
In one case of great interest to your truly, the Board upheld a rare claim under Section 14(3) of the Lanham Act, ordering cancellation of a registration on the ground that the owner used the mark to misrepresent the source of the goods (only to have the decision overturned last month by the Eastern Virginia district court). [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 2:05 pm
The trial court signed a QDRO on July 10, 2013, but TMRS rejected it. [read post]
9 May 2019, 7:25 pm
No. 2018-0683-TMR (Del. [read post]
