Search for: "In Interest of Wd III"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2011, 11:57 pm
Below are my twitter posts since my last post on April 17 of recent cases that I think you'll find of interest. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Arnold, III, CFLS [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:43 am
There is considerable American law on this issue, including the much-discussed decision in Zippo Manufacturing v Zippo Dot Com Inc., 952 F Supp 119 (WD Pa 1997). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
As in Juno, the genus claim here is also functionally claimed, a feature that appears to make it more susceptible to invalidation under both WD and Enablement doctrines. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:29 pm
BK Cts. not w/in 28 USC §610 def. of cts http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/IMMC-BK-D-Del-Carey-2-14-12.pdf … · B-DE: Discl st or plan that didn't identify expected post-confirm. non-ch. 5 avoidance litig. deprives Ct of jurisd. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/IMMC-BK-D-Del-Carey-12-29-11.pdf … · B-OR: If a state ct case is… [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
JPM provides latest insightful thinking into the scope of the "safe harbor" under §546(e) http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Lehman-BK-SDNY-Peck-4-19-12.pdf … B-MI: Name on financing statement not correct corporate name but an assumed name makes fin. st. seriously misleading. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/GOLDMAN-BK-ED-MI-SHEFFERLY-9-13-2011.pdf … B-FL: Threshold reqt & burden of ttee is to produce credible… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
“Valuation Issues in Eminent Domain Litigation: What You Need to Know” Alan Ackerman, Esq. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
(Pix © Larry Catñá Backer; Bronzino Martirio di San Lorenzo, 1565-69, Florence )Judges and lawyers tend to serve as the worker bees of the large jurisprudential colonies of semiotic communities ("They do all the work in the hive, and they control most of what goes on inside. [read post]
