Search for: "In Matter of Davis (thomas J.)"
Results 1 - 20
of 203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
The PPPA protects expression on matters of public interest from being excessively chilled by the threat of litigation arising out of that expression. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
As Thomas Piketty has shown, returns to capital and to labor have been heavily skewed toward capital in recent decades due largely to legal and economic frameworks.[23] With respect to politics, one often hears that business should remain “neutral. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm
See 594 U.S. at 453–54 (Thomas, J., dissenting) ("Never before has this Court declared that legal injury is inherently insufficient to support standing. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
This post and the next are follow-ups to my collection of posts on Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The very first question of the day came from Justice Thomas. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
Thomas G. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
As we see it, it has not been established that Jefferson Davis' becoming President was a matter of concern. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
For example, in Thomas v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Thomas, 458 U.S. 259, 261 (1982) (per curiam) (stating that “the justification to conduct . . . [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
The complaints relate to: Two editions of Friday Morning with Esther and Phil (presented by husband and wife Conservative MPs Esther McVey and Philip Davies); “State of the Nation”, a programme presented by another Tory MP, Jacob Rees-Mogg; and an episode of the Laurence Fox show which was guest presented by Martin Daubney. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Castile & and Stephen J. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
Fancourt J commented that this pair have recently had “a lot to say about this matter outside of court. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
The former vice president also challenged Trump on other matters, including abortion, changes to entitlement programs, comments about Russian President Vladimir Putin, and even general civility. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 10:45 am
Timmons and Melissa J. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
Instead, we got a majority opinion that includes separately stated views from Justices Gorsuch, Thomas, Barrett, Sotomayor, and Kagan, rejecting the claim for different reasons. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
Instead, we got a majority opinion that includes separately stated views from Justices Gorsuch, Thomas, Barrett, Sotomayor, and Kagan, rejecting the claim for different reasons. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Klein and Tyler Miller, Morrison & Foerster LLP, on Wednesday, April 26, 2023 Tags: Activism, anti-ESG, IPOs, regulation, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule Does Board Size Matter? [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Klein and Tyler Miller, Morrison & Foerster LLP, on Wednesday, April 26, 2023 Tags: Activism, anti-ESG, IPOs, regulation, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule Does Board Size Matter? [read post]
