Search for: "In Matter of SS"
Results 141 - 160
of 717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2011, 10:29 pm
This exercise about the applicability of the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963 to the application under Ss. 397 and 398 of the Act, would now appear to be academic as after the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988, applications under these sections lie before the Company Law Board. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:55 am
Greene attempted to obtain copies of the complainant SS's mental health records. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:32 am
This exercise about the applicability of the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963 to the application under Ss. 397 and 398 of the Act, would now appear to be academic as after the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988, applications under these sections lie before the Company Law Board. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:39 am
The government also distributed a news release regarding the changes that these proposed amendments would bring including: permiting “lawful consumer leafleting” when picketing (s. 1); requiring an independent review of the Labour Relations Code every five years (s. 2); permitting a person “to communicate to an employee a statement of fact or opinion reasonably held with respect to the employer’s business” (s. 4); which previously was, “a person has the freedom to… [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:58 am
The nature and degree of privacy to which the person is entitled in any situation or in relation to any matter is fully set out in s-s (2) [now ss. 1(2) and 1(3)] and, in my opinion, no useful purpose would be served in attempting to elaborate upon the words contained therein. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:47 am
A matter adjudicatedScilicet (SS. or ss.) [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
I have the disadvantage of reading far too much, both in the way of legal judgments on such matters and parliamentary committees studying related (though significantly different) matters. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 11:14 am
The chambers judge also erred in ordering disclosure of certain documents under ss. 20 and 35 of the Act. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 3:19 am
L-16.1, ss. 5(b); 13; 14. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 9:01 am
Taras Kulish was not involved in the matter and comments generally on charity law matters. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:31 am
Public displays of the swastika or SS symbols will be punishable by up to a year in prison. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:00 am
Dionne was not a ‘worker’ and was therefore outside the scope of the protection provided by ss. 40 and 41 of the Act. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 9:55 am
The Bill also replaces existing obligations to conduct data protection impact assessments and maintain records of processing with similar, but arguably less prescriptive requirements (ss. 17-18). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:03 pm
In the case at bar, the Hospital established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as matter of law by demonstrating that the necessary billing forms were mailed to and received by Progressive and that payment of the no-fault benefits was overdue based on the ruling in New York & Presbyterian Hosp. v American Transit Insurance Co. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:17 pm
Such an inventor must be identified for any person to be entitled to a grant of a patent under ss 15(1)(b)-(d). [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 6:57 am
Dvorak operated a blog about union matters. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 10:46 am
Dvorak operated a blog about union matters. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 7:25 am
C-23, ss. 12, 21. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 4:30 pm
So, the question for the High Court was stated as: Where, pursuant to EPA 1990, ss. 82, a complaint is made to a Magistrates’ Court in respect of premises alleged to amount to a statutory nuisance as defined in ss. 79(1)(a) can a person only be a “person aggrieved by the existence of (that) statutory nuisance” for the purpose of EPA 1990, ss. 82(1), and thus have locus to make a complaint, if they have some form of interest in the premises? [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 3:37 pm
In November 2019, the Privinvest Defendants sought a stay of the English proceedings, pursuant to Arbitration Act 1996, s 9, which provides at ss (1) that: “A party to an arbitration agreement against whom legal proceedings are brought (whether by way of claim or counterclaim) in respect of a matter which under the agreement is to be referred to arbitration may (upon notice to the other parties to the proceedings) apply to the court in which the proceedings have been brought… [read post]
