Search for: "In RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DATED MARCH 25, 2011 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 5:04 am
In re Grand Jury No. 09-1, 2010 U.S. [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:46 pm
In a case of first impression in the state, the state sought a subpoena duces tecum for a DNA sample, and it was approved by a judge. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
S. 683, 702 (1974) (pretrial subpoenas duces tecum); In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 696 F. 3d 428, 432 (CA5 2012) (grand jury subpoenas); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 616 F. 3d 1186, 1201 (CA10 2010) (same). [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
This can be true `whether under a search warrant or a subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:48 am
In re Grand Jury Duces Tecum, supra. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
(Orin Kerr) The important decision is In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:24 pm
” In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Served upon Levy, 165 N.J. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 11:29 pm
The government produced evidence suggesting Spadoni's awareness of the comprehensive nature of the subpoenas duces tecum typically issued in federal grand jury investigations. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:04 pm
The Eleventh Circuit held, today, that a person cannot be compelled to unencrypt encrypted files under the Fifth Amendment in In re Subpoena Duces Tecum issued March 25, 2011. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:08 pm
Similarly, in re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that decryption and production of a hard drive's content triggered the protection of the Fifth Amendment because it would be testimonial. 670 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1335, 1346 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm
The case is In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, No. 11-12268 & 11-15421 (11th Cir. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 3:03 pm
His analysis relied heavily on In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Oct. 29, 1992 (United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:17 pm
In re Grand Jury Subpoena to Kramerbooks & Afterwords, Inc., 26 Med. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 145 F.3d 1422, 1424-25 & n.2 (D.C.Cir. 1998)(“[i]f the plaintiff’s cause of action is directed at the government’s intent, however, it makes no sense to permit the government to use the [deliberative process] privilege as a shield”). [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
In re Subpoena Duces Tecum, 228 F.3d 341, 348 (4th Cir. 2000) (discussing practical distinctions between search warrant and grand jury subpoena). [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
Last year, in In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum,670 F.3d 1335 (U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:34 am
A case that comes to mind is In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Nov. 15, 1993, 846 F.Supp. 11 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (Mukasey, J.). [read post]
