Search for: "In RE MARRIAGE OF HARMS v. Harms" Results 21 - 40 of 422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2010, 8:23 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Same-sex marriage was never at issue in the case, although Gallagher implies that it was because it was decided at almost the same time as In re Marriage Cases. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:11 pm by lmcclain
I will not join the fray here on that question (although it seems hard for Prop 8 proponents to argue irreparable harm if the order is not stayed, since Californians have been living with the thousands of civil marriages by same-sex couples, entered into the several month interim between the California Supreme Court’s In re Marriage Cases ruling and voter approval of Prop. 8). [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm by Jillian Houle
In In re Marriage of Fingert, a California court decided that “Courts cannot order individuals to move to and live in a community not of their choosing. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:10 am
O.K., come back when you’re done, and read this nitpicking of the Court’s rationale. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am by Steven Calabresi
There is no empirical evidence that the legalization of same-sex marriage would undermine heterosexual marriage or would be harmful to children, contrary to the assertions of those who support state bans on gay marriage. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm
The opinion follows the standard adopted by the Ninth Circuit court in Witt v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
The relatively painless resolution Sutton seemed to favor at oral argument on August 6, ruling that the one-sentence rejection of a same-sex marriage case in 1972′s Baker v. [read post]