Search for: "In RE MARRIAGE OF KENNEDY v. Kennedy"
Results 1 - 20
of 211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
As noted in a recent decision from New York, Matter of Kennedy v. 3rd Track Constructors , 213 A.D.3d 1005, 182 N.Y.S.3d 803 (3d Dept. 2023) [see § 39.03, n. 23.3], the imposition of disqualification penalties must be proportionate to the unethical conduct. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
“Far from seeking to devalue marriage,” Justice Anthony Kennedy responded for the majority in Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Consider the 2001 SCOTUS case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:59 am
” In re Marriage of Kennedy, 418 NE 2d 947 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1981 Furthermore, if the franchises that were started after the marriage were purchased using premarital funds from the older businesses, those newer businesses may be non-marital property as well. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm
” Cooney v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
"It's perfectly clear that nobody in 1868 thought that the 14th Amendment was going to protect the right to same-sex marriage," he says. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
The post Justice Stevens's Papers Reveal How The Fortune Cookies Were Baked In <I>Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm
And more importantly, Justice Kennedy gave a green light to every judge to strike down marriage laws. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Brook v Brook: Rethinking Marriage Choice of LawSarah McKibbin2. [read post]
7 May 2023, 5:39 pm
Maril, From Liberation To (Re)Criminalization: Dobbs v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:44 am
” Kennedy v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
The first is essentially what the originalists have been saying in response to that school, namely that there's too much play in the joints, too many different ways to read these underlying normative principles—we're back to the age-old back-and-forth of "your constitutional theory generates indeterminate results and can't constrain judges' politics! [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Still smarting from the fact that after Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:18 pm
Hodges, establishing a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, Justice Anthony Kennedy had recognized that opponents of same-sex marriage could continue to oppose it and should enjoy First Amendment protection to do so. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 5:36 am
" (NYT).The oral argument is today.If you're trying to remember why this is still a live issue after the wedding-cake case:The court decided Masterpiece Cakeshop on an idiosyncratic ground that is not at issue in the new case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am
” In re Marriage of Kennedy, 418 NE 2d 947 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1981 Business interests acquired AFTER the marriage but where purchased by assets which were acquired BEFORE the marriage may retain their non-marital character. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
The debate in many ways goes back to Justice Holmes’s typically cryptic dissenting opinion in Lochner v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:30 am
So too, the LGBTQ rights movement sought the freedom to marry under the banner of marriage equality--a point that Justice Kennedy's discussion in Obergefell v. [read post]
