Search for: "In RE SHARPE v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2019, 2:13 am
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to provide guidance (this post continues below the document):19-09-06 Sharp Letter Re. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:26 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
United States (2005) 546 U.S. 12, 17–18; see also Bowles v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am
The post Women behind the bar (and the bench): Ginsburg presides over re-enactment of Goesaert v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:49 pm
Co-blogger Will Baude recently blogged about the Supreme Court’s unusual re-argument order in Johnson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 6:25 pm
" Berger v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
The petition of the day is: In re Sharp 15-646 Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 11:07 am
STATEMENT REGARDING RULING STRIKING DOWN THE INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT We strongly disagree and are deeply disappointed with Judge O’Connor’s decision in Brackeen v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:07 am
In Perez v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:33 pm
United States, No. 06-10993 (D. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am
Windsor, in sharp contrast, is focused on the process of social change in media res. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 7:02 pm
“Short sharp shock” is too good a phrase not to re-use, as proved by the fact that after its first use by Mary I of England to describe her hope that burning a few protestants would bring others back into the fold and its popularization by Gilbert and Sullivan it turned up in a song by Pink Floyd and as the title of Michelle Shocked’s first album. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:01 pm
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 1:41 pm
United States (Tribal Courts; Double Jeopardy; Court of Indian Offenses) Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
That notion dates all the way back to a Supreme Court decision in 1890 in the case of In re Burrus. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 10:18 am
They’re always sharp, learned, and eminently readable. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Lady Justice Sharp proceeded to state, at [19] that, when the Court of Appeal comes to consider meaning: “The issue is not whether we would have come to the same or a different conclusion had we been trying the case at first instance. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
In Re: Tableware Antitrust Litigation (No. 04-3514 VRW, N.D. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
This morning brought decisions in both of the patent cases argued in November, with the government prevailing on the constitutional question raised in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
For Monday morning’s re-argument in Johnson v. [read post]
