Search for: "In Re: Justice Court Rules" Results 81 - 100 of 19,297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2010, 3:19 am
 The Court of Justice of the European Union has just delivered its ruling in Case C? [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 8:14 am by Steve Hall
Jordan Smith posts, "Third Court Rules in Willingham Case," at the Austin Chronicle. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:23 am by Ronald Mann
You’re asking the appellate court to decide patentability on the basis of an incomplete, undeveloped record. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:05 am by Keith L. Miller
A single justice of the Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”), has entered a judgment suspending a Boston attorney for a period of three months, after finding that he violated the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 6:50 am by Mack Sperling
The NC COA Had Previously Ruled That A Judge (Not An Arbitrator) Decided Issues Of Res Judicata Allscripts presented two Court of Appeals decisions seeming to dictate a ruling in its favor and giving the Business Court the right to rule on the injunction. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 11:06 am by Chuck Rosenberg
“Doing Justice: A Prosecutor's Thoughts on Crime, Punishment, and the Rule of Law" is written in a way that both an inside audience and a lay audience will savor. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 11:23 am by Isabelle Rahman
An appeal court in Frankfurt has asked the European Court of Justice to clarify the application of the competition rules to online sales. [read post]
5 May 2014, 9:17 am
“The court held in a per curiam opinion that a peremptory challenge during voir dire was barred by precedent --- The court this morning ruled sua sponte that the motion for summary judgment was barred by res judicata… Say what? [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Mr Justice Peter KellyAs the whole world is learning about the Charlie Gard case, other British courts continue to make best interest determinations contrary to family wishes for life-sustaining treatment. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 2:17 pm by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
What’s Next It isn’t known when the Supreme Court will issue a decision, but Fishman expects the justices to act “relatively quickly. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am by Erin Miller
Fourth, Justice Stevens has powerfully re-shaped the law in an astonishing range of areas. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 12:55 pm by Jaimie Cremeans
The court ruled [opinion, JURIST report] in a 4-3 decision last month that the Budget Repair Bill [text, PDF] was not passed in violation of the "open meetings" rule [text], but plaintiffs asked that the case be re-opened because Justice Michael Gableman should have recused himself after failing... [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:56 pm by Amy Howe
” Last week the Trump administration went to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to put Tigar’s order on hold while it appeals his ruling to the U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 6:05 am by Steve Vladeck
Under Supreme Court Rule 20.1, Issuance by the Court of an extraordinary writ authorized by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:39 am by William G. Ross
Charles Evans Hughes, the former governor of New York, resigned from the Court in 1916 to accept a draft from the Republican convention, which needed him to re-unite the party. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 1:28 pm
(Of course, if you're a true devotee, you already knew all about this rule....)Rule 8.74. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 2:29 pm by Elliot Setzer
The Justice Department announced that it will file a petition for a writ of certiorari in In re Application of the Committee on the Judiciary, the Judiciary Committee’s effort to obtain grand jury material relevant to the Mueller Report. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:54 am by Howard Bashman
Now they’re starting to criticize little things they do”: At the “Law & Liberty” blog, Mark Pulliam has this post reviewing law professor Stephen Vladeck‘s forthcoming book, “The Shadow Docket: How the Supreme Court Uses Stealth Rulings to Amass Power and Undermine the Republic. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 3:13 pm
  The court in Re: Goy & Co Ltd. [read post]