Search for: "In Re: A.A.-1, and A.A.-2" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2022, 11:01 am by Phillips & Associates
Those are: (1) that you “suffered intentional discrimination because of” your sex, (2) that the discrimination was severe or pervasive, (3) that the discrimination harmed you, and (4) that the discrimination would harm a reasonable person in your position. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:37 am by MBettman
’s constitutional due process rights for three reasons: (1) A.W. did not receive proper notice; (2) A.W. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:03 am by John L. Welch
The appellate court observed that collateral estoppel requires four elements: (1) a prior action presents an identical issue; (2) the prior action actually litigated and adjudged that issue; (3) the judgment in that prior action necessarily required determination of the identical issue; and (4) the prior action featured full representation of the estopped party. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:50 am by John L. Welch
The subject TTAB case is a chapter in a long-running dispute concerning rights arising out of the works of A.A. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Pour la dernière semaine, les trois décisions en français les plus consultées ont été: 1. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd Jassin
  Example 2: If a songwriter agreement was signed in 1978, the notice of termination could be served as late as two years before the latest recapture date. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 6:23 am by Ryan Goodman
… Whereas, on February 28, 2022, the International Criminal Court stated it would open a formal investigation into Russia’s invasion of Ukraine; Whereas International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim A.A. [read post]
27 May 2023, 5:50 pm
(Ethics Council Recommendation p. 13).)The Council identified the following threats: (1) Dust generated by truck traffic; (2) vibration; (3) visitor impacts; (4) increased humidity (including those generated by Tonasa's activities and the activity of local farmers; (5) and the possibility of loss of undiscovered art. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
In Daubert, the Court referenced five factors courts could use to determine the reliability of expert scientific testimony: (1) whether the expert’s theory or technique can be (and has been) tested; (2) whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) the known or potential rate of error; (4) the existence and maintenance of standards controlling the technique’s operation; and (5) whether the technique has been generally… [read post]