Search for: "In Re: Administrative Orders of the Supreme Court of Mississippi" Results 21 - 40 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2017, 1:45 pm
The case hung over the activists (and the New York Times) for years until the Supreme Court finally dismissed Sullivan’s claims in the landmark 1964 free speech case New York Times v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Supreme Court has endorsed the use of the takings power for private development, the vast majority of state courts that have examined the issue have rejected the Supremes’ expansive definition of “public use. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
Trump administration news Parts of Trump executive orders reducing federal employee collective bargaining rights declared invalid by D.D.C. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The court also held that the district court did not err in ordering defendants to disgorge the full proceeds from its sale of the products in question. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In In re R.J.M.B., however, the [Mississippi] Supreme Court effectively rejected this argument. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:31 am by Russell Jackson
  The district court's order in Comer I was a final order dismissing the case for lack of jurisdiction, which is a decision on the merits for the purposes of res judicata. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 8:12 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  All three plaintiffs had filed administrative charges with the EEOC within the deadline ordered by the district court, and they filed suit within 90 days of receiving right-to-sue letters. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
The Supreme Court partially reversed a decision by the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
We’re now in the middle of the Supreme Court’s nearly month-long midwinter hiatus between conferences. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
The court’s four more liberal justices dissented from the order, with Justice Elena Kagan calling the decision to lift the stay of execution imposed by the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Supreme Court (in a different detainee's case, 2008): Oh yes it is. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:55 pm
Nixon had been saying that he would obey a “definitive” order of the Supreme Court, and the absence of a dissent eliminated any room for Nixon to refuse. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
Apart from the release of the Court’s order list, the big news Monday was the announcement of this year’s Pulitzer Prizes. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[25]  The Mississippi Supreme Court said that the domicile of the twins was off of the reservation and that the state court properly had jurisdiction over the adoption proceedings of those twins.[26]  In support of its position, the Supreme Court of Mississippi stated that the lower court judge “did conform and strictly adhere to the minimum federal standards governing adoption of Indian children with… [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
" (Some federal courts may expurgate this sort of coarse language, but we at Short Circuit—like the Supreme Court—are made of sterner stuff.) [read post]