Search for: "In Re: Adoption of L.R., Appeal of: L.R."
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
According to the case details on the Supreme Court website, the hearing will consider the Rule itself by addressing its limitations and its compatibility with the rule against double proof which states that there can only be one dividend in respect of what is substantially the same debt (In re Oriental Commercial Bank (1871) L.R. 7 Ch. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:10 am
” L.R. 7-9(b)(2). [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
L.R. (6th) 26, rev’d on other grounds 2018 SCC 21, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 633, but disagreed on their application. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 2:24 pm
L.R. 366. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
They pointed out their own displeasure in old cases being re-opened and Scots law’s pragmatic way of dealing with these matters. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
Ms F obtained an injunction for the leaseholders’ re-entry in November and this matter went to trial. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
Ms F obtained an injunction for the leaseholders’ re-entry in November and this matter went to trial. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
STERN v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
We are of the opinion that the above three decisions require to be re-considered as, in our opinion, something which cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly. [read post]
