Search for: "In Re: Adoption of S.B., a Minor (Complete Opinion)"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
” In holding that Domestic Relations Law § 70 “permits a non-biological, non-adoptive parent to achieve standing to petition for custody and visitation” (Brooke S.B., 28 NY3d at 27), the Court of Appeals stressed that it “has gone to great lengths to escape the inequitable results dictated by a needlessly narrow interpretation of the term ‘parent’ ” (Brooke S.B. at 24). [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
” Nonetheless, the court declared, Zauderer “is broad enough to cover S.B. 7072’s disclosure requirements. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
To borrow another phrase from the realm of science (Wolfgang Pauli, this time), some opinions are so far off the mark, not only are they not right, they’re not even wrong. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:23 pm
The simplest way of thinking of incorporation is that the courts tell states, “Hey, you’re not allowed to infringe on that right, in that way. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Some states adopted a ban on this method, and Congress eventually adopted a federal ban in 2003.The Supreme Court upheld the federal ban in Gonzales v. [read post]
